A study to evaluate the role of intradermal and intralesional measles, mumps, rubella (MMR) vaccine in treatment of common warts

Background: Warts are common cutaneous viral infection with a wide range of therapeutic modalities. Various agents have been tried for immunotherapy in warts. Objectives: Determine the role of intralesional and intradermal measles, mumps, rubella (MMR) vaccine in the treatment of common warts; to co...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pragya Gupta (Author), Geeta Ram Tegta (Author), G K Verma (Author), Abhishek Gupta (Author), Mudita Gupta (Author), Shikha Sharma (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2020-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_392e34d6fc8f42cfb83b4f7ba9a0c6c0
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Pragya Gupta  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Geeta Ram Tegta  |e author 
700 1 0 |a G K Verma  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Abhishek Gupta  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Mudita Gupta  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Shikha Sharma  |e author 
245 0 0 |a A study to evaluate the role of intradermal and intralesional measles, mumps, rubella (MMR) vaccine in treatment of common warts 
260 |b Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications,   |c 2020-01-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2229-5178 
500 |a 10.4103/idoj.IDOJ_144_19 
520 |a Background: Warts are common cutaneous viral infection with a wide range of therapeutic modalities. Various agents have been tried for immunotherapy in warts. Objectives: Determine the role of intralesional and intradermal measles, mumps, rubella (MMR) vaccine in the treatment of common warts; to compare the efficacy of intralesional versus intradermal MMR vaccine. Methods and Materials: Patients diagnosed with verruca vulgaris were divided into two groups. In study group A, the individuals were injected with an intralesional MMR vaccine of 0.3 mL in the representative wart (largest) once in 3 weeks till there is complete clearance or maximum of four injections whichever is earlier, while in study group B, the individuals were injected with an intradermal MMR vaccine of 0.3 mL over the unilateral deltoid muscle area at similar intervals. Results: There were 33 patients in each group. In group A, 10 (30.3%) patients showed complete, 9 (27.3%) marked, 6 (18.2%) moderate, 3 (9.1%) mild, and 5 (15.2%) no response. In group B, seven (21.2%) patients showed complete, one (3.0%) marked, one (3.0%) moderate, four (12.1%) mild, and 20 (60.6%) no response. There were minimal side effects in the form of pain, erythema, itching at the injection site in a few patients, only one patient had syncope. Conclusion: We conclude that the MMR vaccine is an effective and safe modality of treatment for verruca vulgaris without any serious adverse effects. Also, the intralesional route showed better results in comparison to the intradermal route when we consider the treatment of a representative wart. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a immunotherapy 
690 |a intradermal 
690 |a intralesional 
690 |a mmr vaccine 
690 |a wart 
690 |a Dermatology 
690 |a RL1-803 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Indian Dermatology Online Journal, Vol 11, Iss 4, Pp 559-565 (2020) 
787 0 |n http://www.idoj.in/article.asp?issn=2229-5178;year=2020;volume=11;issue=4;spage=559;epage=565;aulast=Gupta 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2229-5178 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/392e34d6fc8f42cfb83b4f7ba9a0c6c0  |z Connect to this object online.