Age and race/ethnicity differences in decisional conflict in women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ

Abstract Purpose Women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) face confusion and uncertainty about treatment options. The objective of this study was to determine whether there are differences in decisional conflict about treatment by age and race/ethnicity. Methods A cross-sectional survey...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cecilia Portugal (Author), Albert J. Farias (Author), Erika L. Estrada (Author), Aniket A. Kawatkar (Author)
Format: Book
Published: BMC, 2024-02-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_39da39551fb64ec2a891c3189d56e66c
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Cecilia Portugal  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Albert J. Farias  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Erika L. Estrada  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Aniket A. Kawatkar  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Age and race/ethnicity differences in decisional conflict in women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ 
260 |b BMC,   |c 2024-02-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1186/s12905-024-02935-1 
500 |a 1472-6874 
520 |a Abstract Purpose Women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) face confusion and uncertainty about treatment options. The objective of this study was to determine whether there are differences in decisional conflict about treatment by age and race/ethnicity. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted of women (age ≥ 18) diagnosed with DCIS enrolled at Kaiser Permanente of Southern California. The Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) measured personal perceptions of decision uncertainty, values clarity, and effective decision-making. We used a multivariable regression to study whether age, race, and ethnicity were associated with patient-reported DCS. Results 45% (N = 1395) of women who received the online survey, participated. The mean age was 56 (± 9.6) years, the majority were white. Compared to women younger than 50, women aged 60-69 reported lower overall DCS scores (-5.4; 95% CI -1.5 to -9.3). Women > 70 had lower values clarity scores (-9.0; 95% CI -2.8 to -15.2) about their treatment compared to women aged 50-59 and 60-69 (-7.1; 95% CI -2.9 to -11.3 and − 7.2; 95% CI -2.9 to -11.5) and likewise, lower effective decision-making scores (-5.4; 95% CI -1.7 to -9.2 and − 5.2; 95% CI -1.4 to -9.0) compared to women < 50. Compared to whites, blacks reported lower decision conflict (-4.4; 95% CI 0.04 to -8.8) and lower informed decision (-5.2; 95% CI -0.18 to -10.3) about DCIS treatment. Conclusion Younger women reported higher decisional conflict about DCIS treatment, compared to older women (> 70). Age based tailored discussions about treatment options, health education, and supportive decision-making interventions/tools may reduce decision conflict in future DCIS patients. Trade registration The IRB number is 10678. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Decisional conflict 
690 |a Ductal carcinoma in situ 
690 |a Race/ethnicity 
690 |a Gynecology and obstetrics 
690 |a RG1-991 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n BMC Women's Health, Vol 24, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2024) 
787 0 |n https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-024-02935-1 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1472-6874 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/39da39551fb64ec2a891c3189d56e66c  |z Connect to this object online.