Neuropsychological Functioning in Users of Serotonergic Psychedelics - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Serotonergic psychedelics (SPs) like LSD, psilocybin, DMT, and mescaline are a heterogeneous group of substances that share agonism at 5-HT2a receptors. Besides the ability of these substances to facilitate profoundly altered states of consciousness, persisting psychological effects have...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lukas A. Basedow (Author), Thomas G. Riemer (Author), Simon Reiche (Author), Reinhold Kreutz (Author), Tomislav Majić (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Frontiers Media S.A., 2021-09-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_3c7cfe5959d74c5cb31e14c1a7694cfd
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Lukas A. Basedow  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Thomas G. Riemer  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Thomas G. Riemer  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Simon Reiche  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Reinhold Kreutz  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Tomislav Majić  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Neuropsychological Functioning in Users of Serotonergic Psychedelics - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 
260 |b Frontiers Media S.A.,   |c 2021-09-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 1663-9812 
500 |a 10.3389/fphar.2021.739966 
520 |a Background: Serotonergic psychedelics (SPs) like LSD, psilocybin, DMT, and mescaline are a heterogeneous group of substances that share agonism at 5-HT2a receptors. Besides the ability of these substances to facilitate profoundly altered states of consciousness, persisting psychological effects have been reported after single administrations, which outlast the acute psychedelic effects. In this review and meta-analysis, we investigated if repeated SP use associates with a characteristic neuropsychological profile indicating persisting effects on neuropsychological function.Methods: We conducted a systematic review of studies investigating the neuropsychological performance in SP users, searching studies in Medline, Web of Science, embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and EudraCT. Studies were included if they reported at least one neuropsychological measurement in users of SPs. Studies comparing SP users and non-users that reported mean scores and standard deviations were included in an exploratory meta-analysis.Results: 13 studies (N = 539) published between 1969 and 2020 were included in this systematic review. Overall, we found that only three SPs were specifically investigated: ayahuasca (6 studies, n = 343), LSD (5 studies, n = 135), and peyote (1 study, n = 61). However, heterogeneity of the methodological quality was high across studies, with matching problems representing the most important limitation. Across all SPs, no uniform pattern of neuropsychological impairment was identified. Rather, the individual SPs seemed to be associated with distinct neuropsychological profiles. For instance, one study (n = 42) found LSD users to perform worse in trials A and B of the Trail-Making task, whereas meta-analytic assessment (5 studies, n = 352) of eleven individual neuropsychological measures indicated a better performance of ayahuasca users in the Stroop incongruent task (p = 0.03) and no differences in the others (all p > 0.05).Conclusion: The majority of the included studies were not completely successful in controlling for confounders such as differences in non-psychedelic substance use between SP-users and non-users. Our analysis suggests that LSD, ayahuasca and peyote may have different neuropsychological consequences associated with their use. While LSD users showed reduced executive functioning and peyote users showed no differences across domains, there is some evidence that ayahuasca use is associated with increased executive functioning. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a psychedelic 
690 |a LSD 
690 |a ayahuasca 
690 |a peyote 
690 |a attention 
690 |a neuropsychology 
690 |a Therapeutics. Pharmacology 
690 |a RM1-950 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Frontiers in Pharmacology, Vol 12 (2021) 
787 0 |n https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2021.739966/full 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1663-9812 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/3c7cfe5959d74c5cb31e14c1a7694cfd  |z Connect to this object online.