A Survey of the quality of nursing care in several health districts in South Africa.

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>South Africa is currently focusing strongly on human resource development. The purpose of this study was to describe and compare the quality of nursing service and care in three health districts in the KwaZulu Natal Province. To iden...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Naidoo Joanne R (Author), Uys Leana R (Author)
Format: Book
Published: BMC, 2004-02-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_3c9ee3cda96a451d89a511d7c78a8d6a
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Naidoo Joanne R  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Uys Leana R  |e author 
245 0 0 |a A Survey of the quality of nursing care in several health districts in South Africa. 
260 |b BMC,   |c 2004-02-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1186/1472-6955-3-1 
500 |a 1472-6955 
520 |a <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>South Africa is currently focusing strongly on human resource development. The purpose of this study was to describe and compare the quality of nursing service and care in three health districts in the KwaZulu Natal Province. To identify deficiencies which could be addressed by education and training, it might be useful to measure the quality of care given by nurses.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>From March to August 2002 a survey was done in six hospitals and six clinics in three health districts of the KwaZulu-Natal province of South Africa. Five different aspects of care was evaluated; hand-over from one nursing shift to another, implementation of universal precautions, patient satisfaction, nursing records, management of chronic illnesses. All these aspects were evaluated using checklists based on record reviews or direct observation, except for patient satisfaction, which was evaluated by questionnaires.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The average scores on the different aspects varied from 11% (for nursing records) to 73% (for management of chronic diseases). Specific problems became evident. In one district three out of four hand-overs between shifts of nurses scored less than 50%. In all three districts the use of protective gear scored low (43%). While the average score for management of chronic illnesses were high at 73%, the blood pressures of only 23% was within the target range, and the blood sugar of only 38% of patients were controlled. Patient satisfaction averaged 72% across the three districts.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The quality of care measurements identified specific training needs, but other management strategies are probably also indicated.</p> 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Nursing 
690 |a RT1-120 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n BMC Nursing, Vol 3, Iss 1, p 1 (2004) 
787 0 |n http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/3/1 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1472-6955 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/3c9ee3cda96a451d89a511d7c78a8d6a  |z Connect to this object online.