Student compliance with indications for intravenous cannulation during clinical learning

Background. Intravenous (IV) cannulation is a commonly performed procedure that is taught to a number of health science students. As with most invasive medical interventions, there is a possibility of unintended adverse effects. Therefore, IV cannulation should only be performed for a clearly establ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: C Vincent-Lambert (Author), B van Nugteren (Author)
Format: Book
Published: South African Medical Association, 2015-12-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_3d1fa0f9928f4c38ae6d8fb32d2c3409
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a C Vincent-Lambert  |e author 
700 1 0 |a B van Nugteren  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Student compliance with indications for intravenous cannulation during clinical learning 
260 |b South African Medical Association,   |c 2015-12-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.7196/AJHPE.273 
500 |a 2078-5127 
520 |a Background. Intravenous (IV) cannulation is a commonly performed procedure that is taught to a number of health science students. As with most invasive medical interventions, there is a possibility of unintended adverse effects. Therefore, IV cannulation should only be performed for a clearly established need. Objective. To assess the extent to which emergency medical care students, during the course of their clinical learning, establish IV access in patients without a clearly documented indication. Methods. A retrospective analysis of historical data from a clinical learning database was done to investigate whether patients seen by students over a 2-year period received IV cannulation in line with indications taught to students. Results. Of the 5 893 cases reviewed, 1 862 (32%) were cannulated intravenously. Of these, 426 (23%) did not have a clearly documented indication that had been taught for the procedure. Therefore, these patients may potentially have been ‘overtreated’. Conclusion. This study demonstrates that a high number of IV lines were established by students, with no clearly documented indication. This potential overtreatment may in part be attributed to pressures placed on students to achieve the minimum prescribed number of skills. Such practices remain common in medical education and may be detrimental to the patient. Medical educators need to ensure that students value the patient rather than the procedure. Further research needs to be conducted to investigate and identify other possible reasons for overtreatment of patients by medical students. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Education 
690 |a L 
690 |a Education (General) 
690 |a L7-991 
690 |a Medicine 
690 |a R 
690 |a Medicine (General) 
690 |a R5-920 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n African Journal of Health Professions Education, Vol 7, Iss 2, Pp 158-160 (2015) 
787 0 |n http://www.ajhpe.org.za/index.php/ajhpe/article/download/273/323 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2078-5127 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/3d1fa0f9928f4c38ae6d8fb32d2c3409  |z Connect to this object online.