Four normative perspectives on public health policy-making and their preferences for bodies of evidence
Abstract Calls for evidence-informed public health policy-making often ignore that there are multiple, and often competing, bodies of potentially relevant evidence to which policy-makers have recourse in identifying policy priorities and taking decisions. In this paper, we illustrate how policy fram...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Casper G. Schoemaker (Author), Jeanne van Loon (Author), Peter W. Achterberg (Author), Frank R. J. den Hertog (Author), Henk Hilderink (Author), Johan Melse (Author), Robert A. A. Vonk (Author), Hans van Oers (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
BMC,
2020-08-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Judgment and Decision Making Under Uncertainty: Descriptive, Normative, and Prescriptive Perspectives
Published: (2019) -
Small steps towards an EU health information system
by: Hans van Oers, et al.
Published: (2018) -
Contribution of amenable mortality to life expectancy differences between the Dutch Caribbean islands of Aruba and Curaçao and the Netherlands
by: Soraya P. A. Verstraeten, et al.
Published: (2020) -
Contradictory and weak evidence on the effectiveness of anti-emetics for MTX-intolerance in JIA-patients
by: Casper G. Schoemaker, et al.
Published: (2018) -
Towards translation of environmental determinants of physical activity in children into multi-sector policy measures: study design of a Dutch project
by: van Oers Hans AM, et al.
Published: (2009)