The cost-effectiveness of iruplinalkib versus alectinib in anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive crizotinib-resistant advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients in China

BackgroundIruplinalkib is a second-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with efficacy in patients with ALK-positive crizotinib-resistant advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which is independently developed by a Chinese pharmaceutical company. This stud...

Deskribapen osoa

Gorde:
Xehetasun bibliografikoak
Egile Nagusiak: Zhanjing Dai (Egilea), Jiayi Xu (Egilea), Feng Chang (Egilea), Wanxin Zhou (Egilea), Ting Ren (Egilea), Jiaxin Qiu (Egilea), Yun Lu (Egilea), Yuqiong Lu (Egilea)
Formatua: Liburua
Argitaratua: Frontiers Media S.A., 2024-04-01T00:00:00Z.
Gaiak:
Sarrera elektronikoa:Connect to this object online.
Etiketak: Etiketa erantsi
Etiketarik gabe, Izan zaitez lehena erregistro honi etiketa jartzen!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_3df4cdabb1ce4daa87ec7d6feb007bc3
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Zhanjing Dai  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Jiayi Xu  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Feng Chang  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Wanxin Zhou  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Ting Ren  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Jiaxin Qiu  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Yun Lu  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Yuqiong Lu  |e author 
245 0 0 |a The cost-effectiveness of iruplinalkib versus alectinib in anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive crizotinib-resistant advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients in China 
260 |b Frontiers Media S.A.,   |c 2024-04-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2296-2565 
500 |a 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1333487 
520 |a BackgroundIruplinalkib is a second-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with efficacy in patients with ALK-positive crizotinib-resistant advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which is independently developed by a Chinese pharmaceutical company. This study examined the cost-effectiveness of iruplinalkib versus alectinib in the Chinese healthcare setting.MethodsA partitioned survival model was developed to project the economic and health outcomes. Efficacy was derived using unanchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC). Cost and utility values were obtained from the literature and experts' opinions. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were carried out to evaluate the model's robustness.ResultsTreatment with iruplinalkib versus alectinib resulted in a gain of 0.843 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) with incremental costs of $20,493.27, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $24,313.95/QALY. Parameters related to relative efficacy and drug costs were the main drivers of the model outcomes. From the PSA, iruplinalkib had a 90% probability of being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $37,863.56/QALY.ConclusionCompared to alectinib, iruplinalkib is a cost-effective therapy for patients with ALK-positive crizotinib-resistant advanced NSCLC. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a iruplinalkib 
690 |a alectinib 
690 |a cost-effectiveness 
690 |a anaplastic lymphoma kinase 
690 |a non-small cell lung cancer 
690 |a China 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Frontiers in Public Health, Vol 12 (2024) 
787 0 |n https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1333487/full 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2296-2565 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/3df4cdabb1ce4daa87ec7d6feb007bc3  |z Connect to this object online.