Orthodontic treatment of a case with a congenitally missing maxillary canine and a malformed contralateral canine

Excluding third molars, the prevalence of tooth agenesis of permanent teeth ranges from 1.6% to 9.6%. The congenital absence of maxillary permanent canines is a rare condition with a reported prevalence of less than 0.5%. Case reports describing congenitally missing permanent canines are uncommon, a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Masoud Ahmed I. (Author), Bindagji Feras H. (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Sciendo, 2021-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_3e74c5229fe241a3b4ab8f2eaacd0f7e
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Masoud Ahmed I.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Bindagji Feras H.  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Orthodontic treatment of a case with a congenitally missing maxillary canine and a malformed contralateral canine 
260 |b Sciendo,   |c 2021-01-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2207-7480 
500 |a 10.21307/aoj-2021-013 
520 |a Excluding third molars, the prevalence of tooth agenesis of permanent teeth ranges from 1.6% to 9.6%. The congenital absence of maxillary permanent canines is a rare condition with a reported prevalence of less than 0.5%. Case reports describing congenitally missing permanent canines are uncommon, and those that involve treatment are even more rare. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Australasian Orthodontic Journal, Vol 37, Iss 1, Pp 121-127 (2021) 
787 0 |n https://doi.org/10.21307/aoj-2021-013 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2207-7480 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/3e74c5229fe241a3b4ab8f2eaacd0f7e  |z Connect to this object online.