Neonatal outcomes after preterm birth by mothers' health insurance status at birth: a retrospective cohort study

• Автори: Einarsdóttir Kristjana (Автор), Haggar Fatima A (Автор), Langridge Amanda T (Автор), Gunnell Anthony S (Автор), Leonard Helen (Автор), Stanley Fiona J (Автор)
• Формат: Книга
• Опубліковано: BMC, 2013-02-01T00:00:00Z.
• Предмети: article
• Онлайн доступ: Connect to this object online.
• Notes: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-40; 1472-6963
• Keywords: Health insurance; Preterm birth; Neonatal outcomes; Apgar score; Neonatal resuscitation; Public aspects of medicine; RA1-1270
• Source: BMC Health Services Research, Vol 13, Iss 1, p 40 (2013)

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Publicly insured women usually have a different demographic background to privately insured women, which is related to poor neonatal outcomes after birth. Given the difference in nature and risk of preterm versus term births, it would be important to compare adverse neonatal outcomes after preterm birth between these groups of women after eliminating the demographic differences between the groups.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>The study population included 3085 publicly insured and 3380 privately insured, singleton, preterm deliveries (32-36 weeks gestation) from Western Australia during 1998-2008. From the study population, 1016 publicly insured women were matched with 1016 privately insured women according to the propensity score of maternal demographic characteristics and pre-existing medical conditions. Neonatal outcomes were compared in the propensity score matched cohorts using conditional log-binomial regression, adjusted for antenatal risk factors. Outcomes included Apgar scores less than 7 at five minutes after birth, time until establishment of unassisted breathing (>1 minute), neonatal resuscitation (endotracheal intubation or external cardiac massage) and admission to a neonatal special care unit.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Compared with infants of privately insured women, infants of publicly insured women were more likely to receive a low Apgar score (ARR = 2.63, 95% CI = 1.06-6.52) and take longer to establish unassisted breathing (ARR = 1.61, 95% CI = 1.25-2.07), yet, they were less likely to be admitted to a special care unit (ARR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.80-0.87). No significant differences were evident in neonatal resuscitation between the groups (ARR = 1.20, 95% CI = 0.54-2.67).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The underlying reasons for the lower rate of special care admissions in infants of publicly insured women compared with privately insured women despite the higher rate of low Apgar scores is yet to be determined. Future research is warranted in order to clarify the meaning of our findings for future obstetric care and whether more equitable use of paediatric services should be recommended.</p>