Analysis of Velocity, Power and Skin Temperature in Paralympic Powerlifting Athletes with Fixed and Variable Resistance

• Main Authors: Gildo Francisco dos Santos Filho (Author), Felipe J. Aidar (Author), Márcio Getirana-Mota (Author), Ciro José Brito (Author), Esteban Aedo-Muñoz (Author), Ângelo de Almeida Paz (Author), Joilson Alves de Souza Leite Júnior (Author), Edson Lucas Monteiro Vieira (Author), Pantelis T. Nikolaidis (Author)
• Format: Book
• Published: MDPI AG, 2024-09-01T00:00:00Z.
• Subjects: article
• Online Access: Connect to this object online.

Summary

Variable resistance training has been widely used in athletic preparation. Objectives: To analyze the use of currents (VRT) and the traditional method (TRAD) on speed, power and temperature in a training session. Methods: Fourteen paralympic powerlifting (PP) athletes took part over three weeks. In week 1, familiarization and 1RM tests took place, and, in weeks 2 and 3, pre- and post-training took place, where the propulsive mean velocity and power and temperatures were assessed before and after, at 24 h and 48 h. Results: There was a difference in the sternal pectoral temperatures before and after VRT (<i>p</i> = 0.040) and at 48 h for TRAD and VRT (<i>p</i> = 0.018); in the clavicular pectoralis before and after VRT and TRAD (<i>p</i> = 0.003); in the anterior deltoid after and at 48 h for TRAD and VRT (<i>p</i> = 0.026 and <i>p</i> = 0.017); and in the triceps after and at 24 h and 48 h between TRAD and VRT (<i>p</i> = 0.005). In the training series, the MPV was significant in TRAD between Set1 and Set5 (<i>p</i> = 0.003), in training (VRT) between Set1 and Set5 (<i>p</i> = 0.001) and in Set5 between the methods (<i>p</i> = 0.047). For power, there was a difference between Set1 and 5 in TRAD (<i>p</i> = 0.016) and VRT (<i>p</i> = 0.002). Conclusion: We conclude that training with currents (VRT) promoted greater muscle fatigue when compared to traditional training.

Item Description

10.3390/sports12090250
2075-4663