Surface Micro-Hardness and Wear Resistance of a Self-Adhesive Flowable Composite in Comparison to Conventional Flowable Composites
Objectives: The durability of composite restorations is directly affected by the mechanical properties of the composite. The aim of this study was to evaluate the hardness and wear resistance of self-adhesive flowable composite (SAF) in comparison with conventional flowable composites. Materials and...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Tehran University of Medical Sciences,
2023-05-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000 am a22000003u 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | doaj_3f518f19e1a044089523c4c7b31f8d4d | ||
042 | |a dc | ||
100 | 1 | 0 | |a Fateme Azizi |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Fariba Ezoji |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Soraya Khafri |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Behnaz Esmaeili |e author |
245 | 0 | 0 | |a Surface Micro-Hardness and Wear Resistance of a Self-Adhesive Flowable Composite in Comparison to Conventional Flowable Composites |
260 | |b Tehran University of Medical Sciences, |c 2023-05-01T00:00:00Z. | ||
500 | |a 10.18502/fid.v20i10.12609 | ||
500 | |a 2676-296X | ||
520 | |a Objectives: The durability of composite restorations is directly affected by the mechanical properties of the composite. The aim of this study was to evaluate the hardness and wear resistance of self-adhesive flowable composite (SAF) in comparison with conventional flowable composites. Materials and Methods: In this in vitro study, 50 composite specimens were prepared in brass molds with 10mm ×10mm ×2mm and divided into five groups (n=10). Specimens included three conventional flowable composites (Grandio flow, Filtek flow and Admira fusion flow), one self-adhering flowable composite (SAF, Vertise flow) and a microhybrid composite (filtek z250). After polishing, the micro-hardness of the specimens was measured in a Vickers hardness device, and the specimens were then subjected to 5000, 10000, 20000, 40000, 80000 and 120000 wear cycles in a wear tester. One-way ANOVA/Games-Howell, Kruskal Wallis, and Friedman tests were used for statistical analysis. The significance level was set at P<0.05. Results: The surface micro-hardness of the SAF was significantly lower than that of the microhybrid composite (P=0.01). There was no significant difference between the surface hardness of the different tested flowable composites (P>0.05). Also, the wear resistance of the studied composites was not significantly different in various cycles (P>0.05). Conclusion: Based on our results, SAF would not be an ideal substitute for conventional flowable composites in high-stress areas. | ||
546 | |a EN | ||
690 | |a Dental Restoration Wear | ||
690 | |a Hardness; Composite Resins | ||
690 | |a Flowable Hybrid Composite | ||
690 | |a Dentistry | ||
690 | |a RK1-715 | ||
655 | 7 | |a article |2 local | |
786 | 0 | |n Frontiers in Dentistry, Vol 20 (2023) | |
787 | 0 | |n https://fid.tums.ac.ir/index.php/fid/article/view/4166 | |
787 | 0 | |n https://doaj.org/toc/2676-296X | |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doaj.org/article/3f518f19e1a044089523c4c7b31f8d4d |z Connect to this object online. |