Antibiotic prophylaxis for elective caesarean section - a clinical audit in tertiary care teaching hospital

Objective: The objective of the study was to analyse whether an audit, formulating policies and reaudit will help to improve prophylactic antibiotic usage and increase uniformity among women undergoing elective LSCS. Methodology: A retrospective case note review was performed for all elective caesar...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sowmya K (Author), Suma KB (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Barpeta Obstetrics and Gynaecological Society, 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_3fd56a7e09b0484c934a28cbf6fd32e5
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Sowmya K  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Suma KB   |e author 
245 0 0 |a Antibiotic prophylaxis for elective caesarean section - a clinical audit in tertiary care teaching hospital 
260 |b Barpeta Obstetrics and Gynaecological Society,   |c 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.21276/obgyn.2023.9.2.9 
500 |a 2454-2334 
500 |a 2454-2342 
520 |a Objective: The objective of the study was to analyse whether an audit, formulating policies and reaudit will help to improve prophylactic antibiotic usage and increase uniformity among women undergoing elective LSCS. Methodology: A retrospective case note review was performed for all elective caesarean section occurring over a 3 month period. Guidelines were introduced to address deficiencies and the reaudit was done. Results: During the study total of 204 pregnant women underwent elective LSCS out of which 96 in where in audit cycle and 108 in reaudit group. Prophylactic antibiotic prophylaxis administration was 38.5% v/s 89.8% (audit v/s reaudit group). Out of those who received antibiotic in audit group 40% (15 cases) received antibiotic within 1 hour whereas in reaudit group 79 (81.4%) women received antibiotic within 1 hour. The antibiotic usage in the audit group varied from amoxicillin clavulunic acid to cefoperazone sulbactam to cefotaxime which was mainly based on the operating surgeon's preference (54% v/s 45.9%). In the reaudit group majority of the women received amoxicillin clavulunic 1.2 gm IV /Inj cefotaxime (89% v/s 10.3%). Conclusion: Conducting an audit on usage of prophylactic antibiotic in women undergoing elective LSCS will help to assess the antibiotic usage. Formulating an antibiotic policy for prophylaxis in women undergoing elective LSCS and conducting an reaudit is a simple but effective tool to improve prophylactic antibiotic usage. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a audit 
690 |a caesarean section 
690 |a antibiotic prophylaxis 
690 |a Gynecology and obstetrics 
690 |a RG1-991 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n New Indian Journal of OBGYN, Vol 9, Iss 2, Pp 238-242 (2023) 
787 0 |n https://journal.barpetaogs.co.in/pdf/09238.pdf 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2454-2334 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2454-2342 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/3fd56a7e09b0484c934a28cbf6fd32e5  |z Connect to this object online.