Model-based estimation of the state of vehicle automation as derived from the driver's spontaneous visual strategies

When manually steering a car, the driver's visual perception of the driving scene and his or her motor actions to control the vehicle are closely linked. Since motor behaviour is no longer required in an automated vehicle, the sampling of the visual scene is affected. Autonomous driving typical...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Damien Schnebelen (Author), Camilo Charron (Author), Franck Mars (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Bern Open Publishing, 2021-02-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_3fd6334e322f4efbb1fbba66488a7b4d
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Damien Schnebelen  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Camilo Charron  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Franck Mars  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Model-based estimation of the state of vehicle automation as derived from the driver's spontaneous visual strategies 
260 |b Bern Open Publishing,   |c 2021-02-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.16910/jemr.12.3.10 
500 |a 1995-8692 
520 |a When manually steering a car, the driver's visual perception of the driving scene and his or her motor actions to control the vehicle are closely linked. Since motor behaviour is no longer required in an automated vehicle, the sampling of the visual scene is affected. Autonomous driving typically results in less gaze being directed towards the road centre and a broader exploration of the driving scene, compared to manual driving. To examine the corollary of this situation, this study estimated the state of automation (manual or automated) on the basis of gaze behaviour. To do so, models based on partial least square regressions were computed by considering the gaze behaviour in multiple ways, using static indicators (percentage of time spent gazing at 13 areas of interests), dynamic indicators (transition matrices between areas) or both together. Analysis of the quality of predictions for the different models showed that the best result was obtained by considering both static and dynamic indicators. However, gaze dynamics played the most important role in distinguishing between manual and automated driving. This study may be relevant to the issue of driver monitoring in autonomous vehicles. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a automated driving 
690 |a manual driving 
690 |a gaze behaviour 
690 |a gaze dynamics 
690 |a eye movement 
690 |a region of interest 
690 |a Human anatomy 
690 |a QM1-695 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Journal of Eye Movement Research, Vol 12, Iss 3 (2021) 
787 0 |n https://bop.unibe.ch/JEMR/article/view/6792 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1995-8692 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/3fd6334e322f4efbb1fbba66488a7b4d  |z Connect to this object online.