Buccally displaced flap versus sub-epithelial connective tissue graft for peri-implant soft tissue augmentation: a pilot double-blind randomized controlled trial

Abstract Background This article describes a novel surgical technique, the buccally displaced flap, for keratinized mucosa (KM) augmentation during implant uncovering. Furthermore, it clinically compares this technique with sub-epithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) for peri-implant KM augmentati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ninad Milind Padhye (Author), Lopa Kishor Mehta (Author), Naveeta Yadav (Author)
Format: Book
Published: SpringerOpen, 2020-09-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_4024e00d07d649ae9656f7361b718d92
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Ninad Milind Padhye  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Lopa Kishor Mehta  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Naveeta Yadav  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Buccally displaced flap versus sub-epithelial connective tissue graft for peri-implant soft tissue augmentation: a pilot double-blind randomized controlled trial 
260 |b SpringerOpen,   |c 2020-09-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1186/s40729-020-00244-4 
500 |a 2198-4034 
520 |a Abstract Background This article describes a novel surgical technique, the buccally displaced flap, for keratinized mucosa (KM) augmentation during implant uncovering. Furthermore, it clinically compares this technique with sub-epithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) for peri-implant KM augmentation. Twelve weeks following implant placement, subjects were randomly divided for KM augmentation into group A (buccally displaced flap) and group B (SCTG). The width (WKM) and thickness (TKM) of the KM were assessed prior to the implant uncovering, 4 weeks and 1 year after implant loading. Post-operative pain assessment was performed using the Numeric Rating Scale. Results The study comprised of 20 implants that were uncovered in 20 subjects. For group A, the mean WKM increased from 0.98 (± 0.23 mm) to 3.01 mm (± 0.18 mm), and the mean TKM increased from 1.45 (± 0.13 mm) to 2.21 mm (± 0.16 mm) at 1 year. For group B, the mean WKM increased from 0.93 (± 0.18 mm) to 3.28 mm (± 0.13 mm), and the mean TKM increased from 1.41 (± 0.15 mm) to 2.25 mm (± 0.11 mm) at 1 year. Post-operative pain was significantly higher for group B 4.15 (± 1.35) as compared to group A 2.6 (± 1.22) (p < 0.001). Conclusion The buccally displaced flap increased the WKM and TKM during implant uncovering, with results comparable to SCTG. The main advantages of the technique were lack of sutures, maintenance of blood supply, reducing number of surgical sites, and it was relatively atraumatic with lesser post-operative pain. Trial registration Clinical trials registry-India CTRI/2019/09/021059 . Date of registration-September 4, 2019, retrospectively registered. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Connective tissue graft 
690 |a Displaced flap 
690 |a Peri-implant keratinized mucosa 
690 |a Soft tissue augmentation 
690 |a Surgical flaps 
690 |a Medicine 
690 |a R 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n International Journal of Implant Dentistry, Vol 6, Iss 1, Pp 1-7 (2020) 
787 0 |n http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40729-020-00244-4 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2198-4034 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/4024e00d07d649ae9656f7361b718d92  |z Connect to this object online.