Is bleeding on probing a differential diagnosis between periimplant health and disease?

As far as the periimplant anatomy is considered, the question raised is whether or not healthy periimplant tissues present bleeding on probing (BOP). Aim: To assess if the criterion BOP is strictly related to periimplant disease (PID). Methods: 134 patients were included in this study. All periimpla...

Mô tả đầy đủ

Đã lưu trong:
Chi tiết về thư mục
Những tác giả chính: Priscila Ladeira Casado (Tác giả), Ricardo Villas-Bôas (Tác giả), Luana Cristine Leão da Silva (Tác giả), Letícia Ladeira Bonato (Tác giả), José Mauro Granjeiro (Tác giả)
Định dạng: Sách
Được phát hành: Universidade Estadual de Campinas, 2015-10-01T00:00:00Z.
Những chủ đề:
Truy cập trực tuyến:Connect to this object online.
Các nhãn: Thêm thẻ
Không có thẻ, Là người đầu tiên thẻ bản ghi này!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_4162e78fa8b94aac8e4477c2bf54c7df
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Priscila Ladeira Casado  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Ricardo Villas-Bôas  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Luana Cristine Leão da Silva  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Letícia Ladeira Bonato  |e author 
700 1 0 |a José Mauro Granjeiro  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Is bleeding on probing a differential diagnosis between periimplant health and disease? 
260 |b Universidade Estadual de Campinas,   |c 2015-10-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.20396/bjos.v12i2.8641067 
500 |a 1677-3225 
520 |a As far as the periimplant anatomy is considered, the question raised is whether or not healthy periimplant tissues present bleeding on probing (BOP). Aim: To assess if the criterion BOP is strictly related to periimplant disease (PID). Methods: 134 patients were included in this study. All periimplant regions were clinically and radiographically evaluated. Patients were assigned to 3 groups based on radiographic and clinical aspects in the periimplant region: Group A (healthysites) - no signs of mucosal inflammation or bone loss; Group B (mucositis) - red and swollen mucosa, but no radiographic bone loss; Group C (periimplantitis) - radiographically confirmed pathological bone loss. After this classification, all periimplant sulci were probed at 4 sites (mesial, distal, buccal, lingual/palatal). Patients' mean age was 51.7±12.4 years, 77 women and 57 men, with a total of 486 osseointegrated endosseous implants. Results: Groups A and C showed significant difference in age and implant region distribution (p=0.009 and p=0.008, respectively). After initial clinical and radiographic diagnosis of periimplant status, 33 (20.1%) regions showed BOP in group A. All regions in Group B presented BOP. In Group C, 41 (19.9%) regions showed no BOP. All groups differed significantly considering BOP as diagnosis parameter (p<0.0001). Conclusions: BOP was always present in inflamed mucosa, but it was not always absent in healthy mucosa. Not all periimplantitis regions showed BOP. Clinical and radiographic aspects must always be considered together for diagnosis of PID, even if BOP is absent. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Inflammation 
690 |a Periimplantitis 
690 |a Diagnosis 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences, Vol 12, Iss 2 (2015) 
787 0 |n https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641067 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1677-3225 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/4162e78fa8b94aac8e4477c2bf54c7df  |z Connect to this object online.