Should We Use the Digital Models in Pediatric Dentistry?

Objectives: This study aims to compare the measurements of the extraction spaces in the plaster models and digital dental models and to investigate the usability of the digital models in preventive and interceptive appliances in pediatric dentistry clinics.Material and Methods: In the dental models...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sibel Çayönü (Author), Akif Demirel (Author), Şaziye Sarı (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Cumhuriyet University, 2019-12-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_43ba0a26af934390b09f7a6ceb6312b2
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Sibel Çayönü  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Akif Demirel  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Şaziye Sarı  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Should We Use the Digital Models in Pediatric Dentistry? 
260 |b Cumhuriyet University,   |c 2019-12-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 1302-5805 
500 |a 2146-2852 
500 |a 10.7126/cumudj.612646 
520 |a Objectives: This study aims to compare the measurements of the extraction spaces in the plaster models and digital dental models and to investigate the usability of the digital models in preventive and interceptive appliances in pediatric dentistry clinics.Material and Methods: In the dental models of 56 patients whose first molar teeth were extracted in the early period, the dental arch length of the extraction spaces were measured with a digital caliper in the plaster model (Control Group), with computer software in the digital model (Experimental Group). Measured values were compared using a t-test and statistical significance levels were determined.Results: In plaster models and digital models, the measured mean arc length of the extraction spaces were 6.94 mm and 6.83 mm, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the two measurement methods (p>0.05). Conclusions: The use of digital models is recommended in pediatric dentistry clinics due to shorter chair time in pediatric patients, effective treatment planning/follow-ups, reducing treatment costs and other advantages. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a dental model 
690 |a primary tooth 
690 |a dental occlusion 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Cumhuriyet Dental Journal, Vol 22, Iss 4, Pp 376-381 (2019) 
787 0 |n https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/903989 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1302-5805 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2146-2852 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/43ba0a26af934390b09f7a6ceb6312b2  |z Connect to this object online.