Adherence to oral antineoplastic therapy

Background: Oral chemotherapy agents offer advantages including cost, patient comfort and potential improvement in quality of life versus intravenous drugs. However ensuring adherence and monitoring adverse effects is more difficult. The aim of this study was to examine the real adherence in patient...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: R. Olivera-Fernandez (Author), F. Fernandez-Ribeiro (Author), G. Piñeiro-Corrales (Author), C. Crespo-Diz (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Elsevier, 2014-04-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_44744550a63f41e0890fe3b9ef8b2690
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a R. Olivera-Fernandez  |e author 
700 1 0 |a F. Fernandez-Ribeiro  |e author 
700 1 0 |a G. Piñeiro-Corrales  |e author 
700 1 0 |a C. Crespo-Diz  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Adherence to oral antineoplastic therapy 
260 |b Elsevier,   |c 2014-04-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.7399/fh.2014.38.6.8061 
500 |a 1130-6343 
500 |a 2171-8695 
520 |a Background: Oral chemotherapy agents offer advantages including cost, patient comfort and potential improvement in quality of life versus intravenous drugs. However ensuring adherence and monitoring adverse effects is more difficult. The aim of this study was to examine the real adherence in patients with oral chemotherapy agents in our hospital, to assess the influence of patient and treatment characteristics, to identify reasons for non adherence, to identify pportunities for improvement pharmaceutical care and to assess the potential relation between adherence and treatment outcomes. Method: observational, prospective study for a period of four month, in the patients who were dispensing oral chemotherapy agents in outpatient setting. The medical prescriptions, medical history and patient interviews were used to collect data. Results: 141 patients were assessing. 72% were considered as fully adherent, while 28% reported some kind of non adherence. Adherence was influenced by time from diagnosis and adverse effects. No relationship between adherence and treatment outcomes was found. Conclusions: Adherence to oral chemotherapy was 72%, identifing opportunities for improvement pharmaceutical care to prevent adverse effects and to improve our patient adherence 
546 |a EN 
546 |a ES 
690 |a Adherence 
690 |a Oral chemotherapy 
690 |a ; Capecitabine 
690 |a Tyrosin kinase inhibitor 
690 |a Pharmaceutical care 
690 |a Pharmacy and materia medica 
690 |a RS1-441 
690 |a Therapeutics. Pharmacology 
690 |a RM1-950 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Farmacia Hospitalaria, Vol 38, Iss 6, Pp 475-781 (2014) 
787 0 |n http://www.aulamedica.es/fh/pdf/8061.pdf 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1130-6343 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2171-8695 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/44744550a63f41e0890fe3b9ef8b2690  |z Connect to this object online.