Assessment instruments and depression rates in people with spinal cord injury: a systematic review

ABSTRACT Objective: To identify, describe, differentiate and qualify the instruments used to evaluate depression and also identify the percentage and average rates of depression in people with spinal cord injury. Method: This is a systematic review of the literature implementing a qualitative approa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aline Ferreira Placeres (Author), Regina Célia Fiorati (Author)
Format: Book
Published: SciELO, 2018-12-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_4484f8b3a0d643ca8ab9e521cc6ac7c3
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Aline Ferreira Placeres  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Regina Célia Fiorati  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Assessment instruments and depression rates in people with spinal cord injury: a systematic review 
260 |b SciELO,   |c 2018-12-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 1980-220X 
500 |a 10.1590/s1980-220x2017037303388 
520 |a ABSTRACT Objective: To identify, describe, differentiate and qualify the instruments used to evaluate depression and also identify the percentage and average rates of depression in people with spinal cord injury. Method: This is a systematic review of the literature implementing a qualitative approach. SciELO, LILACS, PubMed and PsycINFO databases were consulted. Original articles were classified according to the variables (Spinal Cord Injury, Depression and Assessment instruments). The studies are presented according to the instruments in recent publications in the past 11 years. Results: Five evaluation instruments were found. PHQ-9, a screening instrument for diagnosing depression was used in most studies, with all being performed in the United States and having a higher impact factor and number of participants. Studies with PHQ-9 presented a total score of people who met the criteria for depression without grading by severity with an average of 17.6% ± 7.3%, while BDI presented 51.6% ± 15.1% and the HADS showed 37.5% ± 31% of people with some degree of depression. Conclusion: This study was important in identifying which instruments can be used to assess depression, the description of each, some of their differences, which ones are used in the best studies and o the depression rates in different parts of the world. It was also important to show how the PHQ-9 is an important instrument, but is limited to being used in the USA. 
546 |a EN 
546 |a ES 
546 |a PT 
690 |a Depression 
690 |a Paraplegia 
690 |a Spinal Cord 
690 |a Disability Evaluation 
690 |a Psychiatric Nursing 
690 |a Review 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
690 |a Nursing 
690 |a RT1-120 
690 |a Mental healing 
690 |a RZ400-408 
690 |a Education (General) 
690 |a L7-991 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, Vol 52, Iss 0 (2018) 
787 0 |n http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080-62342018000100809&lng=en&tlng=en 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1980-220X 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/4484f8b3a0d643ca8ab9e521cc6ac7c3  |z Connect to this object online.