Comparative evaluation of feldespatic crowns fitness made from additional silicon impression and gypsum cast by CAD/CAM
Background and Aims: Marginal fit is one of the key factors in the success of fixed restoration. The aim of this study was to evaluate the fitness of feldespatic crowns made from additional silicon impression and gypsum cast by CAD/CAM. Materials and Methods: 10 intact extracted upper premolar tee...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Tehran University of Medical Sciences,
2015-05-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background and Aims: Marginal fit is one of the key factors in the success of fixed restoration. The aim of this study was to evaluate the fitness of feldespatic crowns made from additional silicon impression and gypsum cast by CAD/CAM. Materials and Methods: 10 intact extracted upper premolar teeth were used for this experimental study. After preparation of the mounted teeth with radial shoulder finish line, 2 Vita Mark II feldespatic CAD/CAM machined crowns were fabricated for each tooth (one from scanning the additional silicone impression of the prepared tooth and the other one from the plaster model). Marginal gap of each crown was measured using SEM in two points on the mesial and 2 points on the buccal surface. Data were analyzed using Paired t-test with SPSS version 17 software (P<0.05). Results: The mean of marginal gaps in crowns fabricated from additional silicone and model plaster were (155.13±37.11) and (130.18±12.35), respectively. However, no significant difference emerged between marginal gaps of the two methods (P=0.055). Also, the mean of marginal gaps in crowns fabricated from additional silicone and model plaster was higher in mesial (157.82±44.41) compared to buccal (127.50±24.26) region (P=0.003). Conclusion: Marginal fit was not significantly differen ce between crown s made of the plaster casts and silicone molds and both methods showed the same results . |
---|---|
Item Description: | 1024-641X 2008-2444 |