Criteria of ultrasound-guided closed reduction with percutaneous pinning in unstable humeral lateral condylar fractures: a three-center retrospective cohort study

BackgroundInterventions using ultrasound-guided closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (UG-CRPP) of humeral lateral condylar fractures (HLCFs) have been increasingly applied; however, their effectiveness for unstable HLCFs and the criteria for ultrasound outcomes remain unclear. This study assess...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xiuming Huang (Author), Chaoyu Liu (Author), Guoqiang Jia (Author), Jie Yao (Author), Jianbing Xu (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Frontiers Media S.A., 2024-03-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_47a5c78d958046e5a6d76e906b79f791
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Xiuming Huang  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Chaoyu Liu  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Guoqiang Jia  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Jie Yao  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Jianbing Xu  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Criteria of ultrasound-guided closed reduction with percutaneous pinning in unstable humeral lateral condylar fractures: a three-center retrospective cohort study 
260 |b Frontiers Media S.A.,   |c 2024-03-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2296-2360 
500 |a 10.3389/fped.2024.1373913 
520 |a BackgroundInterventions using ultrasound-guided closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (UG-CRPP) of humeral lateral condylar fractures (HLCFs) have been increasingly applied; however, their effectiveness for unstable HLCFs and the criteria for ultrasound outcomes remain unclear. This study assessed the outcomes of UG-CRPP for HLCFs and evaluated the success criteria in children.MethodsData were retrospectively collected from 106 patients with unstable HLCFs admitted to three hospitals between January 2021 and August 2022. Fifty-five cases were left-sided and 51 cases were right-sided: 74 male patients and 32 female patients were included. Perioperative data, elbow function, complications, and criteria for UG-CRPP were analyzed.ResultsThe mean rate of UG-CRPP was 88%. The mean surgical time was 54.56 ± 21.07 min, and the mean fluoroscopy frequency was 9.25 ± 2.93 times. At the last follow-up, there were significant differences in elbow flexion between the affected side (135.82° ± 6.92°) and the unaffected side (140.58° ± 5.85°) (p = 0.01). The Mayo score of the affected side was 90.28° ± 4.97°, the Baumann angle was 71.4° ± 5.4°, condylar shaft angle was 39.9° ± 6.4°, and the carrying angle was 8.4° ± 3.6°. Seventy patients presented mild lateral spurs and 16 patients exhibited moderate spurs. Fourteen patients presented with pin infection, and one patient exhibited postoperative re-displacement. There was no premature physeal closure, varus, or valgus elbow deformity, delayed union, or non-union. Successful ultrasound-based outcome criteria for UG-CRPP were defined as follows: (i) absent or less than a cartilage thickness step on the cartilage hinge on coronal plane parallel articular surface scanning, (ii) no lateral displacement and intact distal end of the condylar and capitellum on coronal plane vertical articular surface scanning, (iii) no anteroposterior displacement and absent or less than a cartilage thickness step on sagittal plane vertical articular surface scanning, and (iv) intact posterior fracture line or less than a cortex step on posterolateral sagittal plane vertical articular surface scanning.ConclusionUG-CRPP is a procedure with minimal blood loss, less invasive, cosmetic, and no radiation exposure. It yielded good outcomes in unstable HLCFs. The successful criteria make it suitable for clinical application. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a ultrasound 
690 |a humeri 
690 |a closed reduction 
690 |a lateral condylar fracture 
690 |a pediatric 
690 |a Pediatrics 
690 |a RJ1-570 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Frontiers in Pediatrics, Vol 12 (2024) 
787 0 |n https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2024.1373913/full 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2296-2360 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/47a5c78d958046e5a6d76e906b79f791  |z Connect to this object online.