Using the Design Thinking Process to Co-create a New, Interdisciplinary Design Thinking Course to Train 21st Century Graduate Students

Background: Our instructional team at the The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill led an innovative project that used IDEO.org's design thinking process to create a brand-new interdisciplinary graduate course, housed in the school of public health, titled Design Thinking for the Public...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Emily Rose Skywark (Author), Elizabeth Chen (Author), Vichitra Jagannathan (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Frontiers Media S.A., 2022-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_47d494cc110a4f089dc35e3d761ac8d0
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Emily Rose Skywark  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Elizabeth Chen  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Vichitra Jagannathan  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Using the Design Thinking Process to Co-create a New, Interdisciplinary Design Thinking Course to Train 21st Century Graduate Students 
260 |b Frontiers Media S.A.,   |c 2022-01-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2296-2565 
500 |a 10.3389/fpubh.2021.777869 
520 |a Background: Our instructional team at the The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill led an innovative project that used IDEO.org's design thinking process to create a brand-new interdisciplinary graduate course, housed in the school of public health, titled Design Thinking for the Public Good. We offer our course design process as a case study of the use of design thinking for course design.Methods: We collected data and generated insights through a variety of inspiration, ideation, and implementation design thinking methods alongside members of our three stakeholder groups: (1) faculty who teach or have taught courses related to design thinking at our higher education institution; (2) design thinking experts at ours and other institutions and outside of higher education; and (3) graduate students at our institution.Results: We learned that interdisciplinary design thinking courses should include growth-oriented reflection, explicit group work skills, and content with a real-world application.Conclusions: Our course design process and findings can be replicated to design courses regardless of area of study, level, or format. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a co-creation 
690 |a course development 
690 |a social innovation 
690 |a curricular development 
690 |a complex problem solving 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Frontiers in Public Health, Vol 9 (2022) 
787 0 |n https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2021.777869/full 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2296-2565 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/47d494cc110a4f089dc35e3d761ac8d0  |z Connect to this object online.