Impact of Refutational Two-Sided Messages on Attitudes Toward Novel Vaccines Against Emerging Infectious Diseases During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Two-sided messages that include two perspectives (i.e., risks and benefits) are more effective than one-sided messages that convey only one perspective (usually only the benefits). Refutational two-sided messages are effective for communicating risks regarding vaccines. To examine the effectiveness...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Hideo Okuno (Author), Satoru Arai (Author), Motoi Suzuki (Author), Toshiko Kikkawa (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.,
2022-02-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Gender differences in responses to an altruistic message regarding rubella vaccination
by: Hideo Okuno, et al.
Published: (2024) -
WHO refutes malaria malpractice allegations
Published: (2004) -
Identifying the population susceptible to rubella in Japan, 2020: Fine-scale risk mapping
by: Ryo Kinoshita, et al.
Published: (2024) -
Dissemination and Refutation of Rumors During the COVID-19 Outbreak in China: Infodemiology Study
by: Chen, Bin, et al.
Published: (2021) -
Control, elimination, eradication and re-emergence of infectious diseases: getting the message right
by: Heymann David L
Published: (2006)