Interventions Aimed at Enhancing Health Care Providers' Behavior Toward the Prescription of Mobile Health Apps: Systematic Review

BackgroundMobile health (mHealth) apps have great potential to support the management of chronic conditions. Despite widespread acceptance of mHealth apps by the public, health care providers (HCPs) are reluctant to prescribe or recommend such apps to their patients. ObjectiveThis study aimed to cla...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ohoud Alkhaldi (Author), Brian McMillan (Author), Noha Maddah (Author), John Ainsworth (Author)
Format: Book
Published: JMIR Publications, 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_49d0d6b3944c4fd2ba509b15b173f69b
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Ohoud Alkhaldi  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Brian McMillan  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Noha Maddah  |e author 
700 1 0 |a John Ainsworth  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Interventions Aimed at Enhancing Health Care Providers' Behavior Toward the Prescription of Mobile Health Apps: Systematic Review 
260 |b JMIR Publications,   |c 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2291-5222 
500 |a 10.2196/43561 
520 |a BackgroundMobile health (mHealth) apps have great potential to support the management of chronic conditions. Despite widespread acceptance of mHealth apps by the public, health care providers (HCPs) are reluctant to prescribe or recommend such apps to their patients. ObjectiveThis study aimed to classify and evaluate interventions aimed at encouraging HCPs to prescribe mHealth apps. MethodsA systematic literature search was conducted to identify studies published from January 1, 2008, to August 5, 2022, using 4 electronic databases: MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, and PsycINFO. We included studies that evaluated interventions encouraging HCPs to prescribe mHealth apps. Two review authors independently assessed the eligibility of the studies. The "National Institute of Health's quality assessment tool for before-and-after (pretest-posttest design) studies with no control group" and "the mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT)" were used to assess the methodological quality. Owing to high levels of heterogeneity between interventions, measures of practice change, specialties of HCPs, and modes of delivery, we conducted a qualitative analysis. We adopted the behavior change wheel as a framework for classifying the included interventions according to intervention functions. ResultsIn total, 11 studies were included in this review. Most of the studies reported positive findings, with improvements in a number of outcomes, including increased knowledge of mHealth apps among clinicians, improved self-efficacy or confidence in prescribing, and an increased number of mHealth app prescriptions. On the basis of the behavior change wheel, 9 studies reported elements of environmental restructuring such as providing HCPs with lists of apps, technological systems, time, and resources. Furthermore, 9 studies included elements of education, particularly workshops, class lectures, individual sessions with HCPs, videos, or toolkits. Furthermore, training was incorporated in 8 studies using case studies or scenarios or app appraisal tools. Coercion and restriction were not reported in any of the interventions included. The quality of the studies was high in relation to the clarity of aims, interventions, and outcomes but weaker in terms of sample size, power calculations, and duration of follow-up. ConclusionsThis study identified interventions to encourage app prescriptions by HCPs. Recommendations for future research should consider previously unexplored intervention functions such as restrictions and coercion. The findings of this review can help inform mHealth providers and policy makers regarding the key intervention strategies impacting mHealth prescriptions and assist them in making informed decisions to encourage this adoption. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Information technology 
690 |a T58.5-58.64 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n JMIR mHealth and uHealth, Vol 11, p e43561 (2023) 
787 0 |n https://mhealth.jmir.org/2023/1/e43561 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2291-5222 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/49d0d6b3944c4fd2ba509b15b173f69b  |z Connect to this object online.