Accuracy Analysis of Digital Models from Intraoral Scanners and 3D-Printed Casts in Children and Teenagers

• Main Authors: Diego Serrano-Velasco (Author), Andrea Martín-Vacas (Author), Giovanni Giovannini (Author), Marta Macarena Paz-Cortés (Author), Juan Manuel Aragoneses (Author)
• Format: Book
• Published: MDPI AG, 2024-09-01T00:00:00Z.
• Subjects: article
• Online Access: Connect to this object online.

Summary

Purpose: The aim was to analyze the accuracy of digital models and 3D-printed casts from full-arch digital impressions using two intraoral scanners (iTero^TM and Primescan^TM). Materials and methods: A crossover reliability study was designed, scanning children and teenagers with iTero^TM and Primescan^TM. Accuracy was evaluated by measuring intercanine, intermolar, and ipsilateral canine-molar distances intraorally and comparing these measurements with those from plaster casts, digital models obtained with intraoral scanners, and 3D-printed casts. A paired comparison and a general linear model with a one-way repeated measures ANOVA procedure were carried out with a confidence level of 95% (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.05). Results: A total of 51 subjects were analyzed (mean age 12.35 ± 2.57). Statistical differences (<i>p</i> < 0.05) were found in the upper and lower arch regarding accuracy in comparison to intraoral measurements, except for the iTero^TM-printed cast and canine-molar upper right and intercanine lower distances (<i>p</i> > 0.05 for all comparisons). Regarding a comparison between reproduction methods, the plaster cast oversized the intercanine upper distance in comparison with both intraoral scanners' digital models and the Primescan^TM-printed cast (<i>p</i> = 0.001), but there were no differences in the lower arch (<i>p</i> > 0.05 for all comparisons). Conclusion: Intraoral scanners reproduce tooth structures with similar accuracy to conventional methods.

Item Description

10.3390/children11091082
2227-9067