A Structured Intervention for Medical Students Significantly Improves Awareness of Stigmatisation in Visible Chronic Skin Diseases: A Randomised Controlled Trial

People with visible skin diseases often experience stigmatisation. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a new intervention for medical students to counter the stigmatisation of people with skin diseases. The intervention was evaluated using a randomised controlled design. Effectiveness...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rachel Sommer (Author), Natascha-Alexandra Weinberger (Author), Regina von Spreckelsen (Author), Ulrich Mrowietz (Author), Maximilian C. Schielein (Author), Claudia Luck-Sikorski (Author), Matthias Augustin (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Medical Journals Sweden, 2022-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_4b7f8d67a63e48a999cf7c2082fd659e
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Rachel Sommer  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Natascha-Alexandra Weinberger  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Regina von Spreckelsen  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Ulrich Mrowietz  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Maximilian C. Schielein  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Claudia Luck-Sikorski  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Matthias Augustin  |e author 
245 0 0 |a A Structured Intervention for Medical Students Significantly Improves Awareness of Stigmatisation in Visible Chronic Skin Diseases: A Randomised Controlled Trial 
260 |b Medical Journals Sweden,   |c 2022-01-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.2340/actadv.v101.894 
500 |a 0001-5555 
500 |a 1651-2057 
520 |a People with visible skin diseases often experience stigmatisation. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a new intervention for medical students to counter the stigmatisation of people with skin diseases. The intervention was evaluated using a randomised controlled design. Effectiveness was assessed at 3 time points. Data from 127 participants were analysed. Regarding the outcome "social distance", a significant difference between the measurement points was observed for the intervention group (χ2(2) = 54.32, p < 0.001), which also showed a significant effect on agreement with negative stereotypes (F(1.67, 118.67) = 23.83, p < 0.001, partial η2 = 0.25). Regarding the outcome "agreement with disease-related misconceptions", a significant difference between the measurement time points was observed for the intervention group (χ2(2) = 46.33, p < 0.001); similar results were found for the outcome "stigmatising behaviour" (F(1.86, 131.89) = 6.16, p = 0.003, partial η2 = 0.08). The results should encourage medical faculties to invest in such courses in order to prevent stigmatisation of people with skin diseases. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a stigmatisation 
690 |a visible skin diseases 
690 |a intervention 
690 |a randomised controlled trial 
690 |a Dermatology 
690 |a RL1-803 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Acta Dermato-Venereologica, Vol 102 (2022) 
787 0 |n https://medicaljournalssweden.se/actadv/article/view/894 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/0001-5555 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1651-2057 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/4b7f8d67a63e48a999cf7c2082fd659e  |z Connect to this object online.