Exercise to reduce work-related fatigue among employees: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVES: The present study evaluated the efficacy of an exercise intervention to reduce work-related fatigue (emotional exhaustion, overall fatigue, and need for recovery). The effects of exercise on self-efficacy, sleep, work ability, cognitive functioning and aerobic fitness (secondary outcomes...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Juriena D de Vries (Author), Madelon LM van Hooff (Author), Sabine AE Geurts (Author), Michiel AJ Kompier (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Nordic Association of Occupational Safety and Health (NOROSH), 2017-07-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_4b9d318891b741c2a2e5ec3d2e7b523c
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Juriena D de Vries  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Madelon LM van Hooff  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Sabine AE Geurts  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Michiel AJ Kompier  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Exercise to reduce work-related fatigue among employees: a randomized controlled trial 
260 |b Nordic Association of Occupational Safety and Health (NOROSH),   |c 2017-07-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 0355-3140 
500 |a 1795-990X 
500 |a 10.5271/sjweh.3634 
520 |a OBJECTIVES: The present study evaluated the efficacy of an exercise intervention to reduce work-related fatigue (emotional exhaustion, overall fatigue, and need for recovery). The effects of exercise on self-efficacy, sleep, work ability, cognitive functioning and aerobic fitness (secondary outcomes) were also investigated. METHODS: Employees with high levels of work-related fatigue were randomly assigned to either a 6-week exercise intervention (EI; N=49) or a wait-list control group (WLC; N=47). All participants were measured pre- (T0) and post-intervention (T1). EI participants were also measured 6 (T2) and 12 weeks (T3) after the end of the intervention. Analyses were based on intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP). PP analyses only included EI participants (N=31) who completed the intervention and WLC participants (N= 35) who did not increase their exercise level during the wait period. RESULTS: Analyses of covariance (ANCOVA) revealed that, at T1, the EI group reported lower emotional exhaustion and overall fatigue than the WLC group, however, only according to PP analyses. Both according to ITT and PP analyses, EI participants showed higher sleep quality, work ability, and self-reported cognitive functioning at T1 compared to WLC participants. Intervention effects were maintained at T2 and T3. CONCLUSIONS: The exercise intervention had enduring effects on work-related fatigue and broader indicators of employee well-being. This study demonstrates that, in case of work-related fatigue, exercise does constitute a powerful medicine for those who comply with the treatment. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a randomized controlled trial 
690 |a burnout 
690 |a need for recovery 
690 |a employee well-being 
690 |a rct 
690 |a work-related fatigue 
690 |a employee fatique 
690 |a emotional exhaustion 
690 |a fatigue 
690 |a exercise 
690 |a intervention 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, Vol 43, Iss 4, Pp 337-349 (2017) 
787 0 |n  https://www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?abstract_id=3634  
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/0355-3140 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1795-990X 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/4b9d318891b741c2a2e5ec3d2e7b523c  |z Connect to this object online.