An Invitro Study on Microleakage of Root MTA, Proroot MTA, One Coat Bond and Amalgam in Furcation Perforation Repair
Introduction: Furcal perforation is a common accident during endodontic treatment. Prognosis of furcal perforation repair is determined by several factors. One of these factors is sealing ability and biocompatibility of materials used to repair furcal perforation. So far, different materials have be...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | M Bidar (Author), R Disfani (Author), M Charechahi (Author), R Tabatabai (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences,
2007-01-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
In Vitro Comparison of the Push-Out Bond Strength of RetroMTA, OrthoMTA, and ProRoot MTA
by: G Sedaghati, et al.
Published: (2023) -
A Comparison between Amalgam and MTA in Repairing Furcal Perforation
by: H. Ghanbari, et al.
Published: (2008) -
Biocompatibility of NeoMTA Plus® versus MTA Angelus as delayed furcation perforation repair materials in a dog model
by: Khaled M. Abboud, et al.
Published: (2021) -
Deconvolution of the particle size distribution of ProRoot MTA and MTA Angelus
by: William Nguyen Ha, et al.
Published: (2016) -
The effect of blood and synthetic tissue fluid on the microhardness of ProRoot MTA, OrthoMTA and RetroMTA
by: Noushin Shokouhinejad, et al.
Published: (2017)