Evaluation of the Cochrane Consumers and Communication Group's systematic review priority-setting project
ABSTRACT Background Health researchers and funders are increasingly consulting with stakeholders to set their research agendas but these activities are rarely evaluated. The Cochrane Consumers and Communication Group (CCCG) conducted a priority-setting project for systematic reviews in partnership w...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Anneliese Synnot (Author), Allison Tong (Author), Rebecca Ryan (Author), Sophie Hill (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
BMC,
2020-09-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Selecting, refining and identifying priority Cochrane Reviews in health communication and participation in partnership with consumers and other stakeholders
by: Anneliese J. Synnot, et al.
Published: (2019) -
Supporting implementation of Cochrane methods in complex communication reviews: resources developed and lessons learned for editorial practice and policy
by: Rebecca Ryan, et al.
Published: (2019) -
Setting priorities for knowledge translation of Cochrane reviews for health equity: Evidence for Equity
by: Peter Tugwell, et al.
Published: (2017) -
Reporting and methodologic quality of Cochrane Neonatal review group systematic reviews
by: Al Faleh Khalid, et al.
Published: (2009) -
Self-care for anxiety and depression: a comparison of evidence from Cochrane reviews and practice to inform decision-making and priority-setting
by: Karen Pilkington, et al.
Published: (2020)