Multilocular Unicystic Ameloblastoma of Mandible

Introduction. We report a rare case of unicystic ameloblastoma (UA) of mandible which showed multilocular radiolucency on the left side of mandible on radiographic examination which is very unusual, and the majority of the cases of UAs till date has been reported of unilocular radiolucency. On histo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Manas Bajpai (Author), Deshant Agarwal (Author), Anindya Bhalla (Author), Malay Kumar (Author), Rakesh Garg (Author), Manish Kumar (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Hindawi Limited, 2013-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_4d2e7b7debcf4683b97ed8cacf7afbab
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Manas Bajpai  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Deshant Agarwal  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Anindya Bhalla  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Malay Kumar  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Rakesh Garg  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Manish Kumar  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Multilocular Unicystic Ameloblastoma of Mandible 
260 |b Hindawi Limited,   |c 2013-01-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2090-6447 
500 |a 2090-6455 
500 |a 10.1155/2013/835892 
520 |a Introduction. We report a rare case of unicystic ameloblastoma (UA) of mandible which showed multilocular radiolucency on the left side of mandible on radiographic examination which is very unusual, and the majority of the cases of UAs till date has been reported of unilocular radiolucency. On histopathological examination, an odontogenic cystic lining that proliferates that intraluminally resembling ameloblastomatous epithelium was observed, leading to a definitive diagnosis of unicystic ameloblastoma. Case Presentation. A 42-year-old male patient presented with a swelling on the left side of the mandible extending from 33 to 36. Radiographically, it showed a multilocular radiolucent lesion resembling odontogenic cyst; however, the final diagnosis was made on histopathological ground with the inclusion of radiological and clinical features. Conclusion. It can be concluded that at present, histopathologic examination is the most sensitive tool for differentiating between odontogenic cysts and UAs. However, both clinical and radiologic findings share equal contribution to the final diagnosis. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Case Reports in Dentistry, Vol 2013 (2013) 
787 0 |n http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/835892 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2090-6447 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2090-6455 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/4d2e7b7debcf4683b97ed8cacf7afbab  |z Connect to this object online.