2023 cyberbiosecurity summit underscores challenges associated with cybersecurity and the rapidly growing bioeconomy

The 2 November 2023 Cyberbiosecurity Summit at Georgia Tech Research Institute's (GTRI) headquarters in Atlanta united cybersecurity and biotechnology stakeholders to address safeguarding of bio-based industries. Goals included identifying cyberbiosecurity vulnerabilities and establishing preve...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nicholas Guise (Author), David Pattie (Author), Kenneth B. Yeh (Author), Kemper Talley (Author), Rachel Fennell Fezzie (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Taylor & Francis Group, 2024-12-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_4db9eefd73f8423c99b1ce48e4cb6d04
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Nicholas Guise  |e author 
700 1 0 |a David Pattie  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Kenneth B. Yeh  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Kemper Talley  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Rachel Fennell Fezzie  |e author 
245 0 0 |a 2023 cyberbiosecurity summit underscores challenges associated with cybersecurity and the rapidly growing bioeconomy 
260 |b Taylor & Francis Group,   |c 2024-12-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1080/23779497.2024.2401164 
500 |a 2377-9497 
520 |a The 2 November 2023 Cyberbiosecurity Summit at Georgia Tech Research Institute's (GTRI) headquarters in Atlanta united cybersecurity and biotechnology stakeholders to address safeguarding of bio-based industries. Goals included identifying cyberbiosecurity vulnerabilities and establishing prevention best practices for emerging biotech hardware, software, data and bio-based systems. The Summit highlighted risks and explored mitigation strategies for a safer bioeconomy. Key takeaways include: (1) as genome databases proliferate globally, it becomes more likely that these databases will become targets for cyberbiosecurity attacks; (2) the biotech community should not view cybersecurity as an impediment to research, but rather as a national security and global health imperative for proactive investment and workforce training; (3) the bioeconomy depends on a vulnerable supply chain for software; and (4) mapping of a biological attack surface, inspired by traditional cybersecurity assessments, would facilitate identification of vulnerabilities of cyber-bio-physical systems and the development of protective measures for the bioeconomy. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Artificial intelligence 
690 |a bioeconomy 
690 |a cyberbiosecurity 
690 |a genomic sequencing 
690 |a synthetic biology 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
690 |a Military Science 
690 |a U 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Global Security: Health, Science and Policy, Vol 9, Iss 1 (2024) 
787 0 |n https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/23779497.2024.2401164 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2377-9497 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/4db9eefd73f8423c99b1ce48e4cb6d04  |z Connect to this object online.