2023 cyberbiosecurity summit underscores challenges associated with cybersecurity and the rapidly growing bioeconomy
The 2 November 2023 Cyberbiosecurity Summit at Georgia Tech Research Institute's (GTRI) headquarters in Atlanta united cybersecurity and biotechnology stakeholders to address safeguarding of bio-based industries. Goals included identifying cyberbiosecurity vulnerabilities and establishing preve...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group,
2024-12-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000 am a22000003u 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | doaj_4db9eefd73f8423c99b1ce48e4cb6d04 | ||
042 | |a dc | ||
100 | 1 | 0 | |a Nicholas Guise |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a David Pattie |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Kenneth B. Yeh |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Kemper Talley |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Rachel Fennell Fezzie |e author |
245 | 0 | 0 | |a 2023 cyberbiosecurity summit underscores challenges associated with cybersecurity and the rapidly growing bioeconomy |
260 | |b Taylor & Francis Group, |c 2024-12-01T00:00:00Z. | ||
500 | |a 10.1080/23779497.2024.2401164 | ||
500 | |a 2377-9497 | ||
520 | |a The 2 November 2023 Cyberbiosecurity Summit at Georgia Tech Research Institute's (GTRI) headquarters in Atlanta united cybersecurity and biotechnology stakeholders to address safeguarding of bio-based industries. Goals included identifying cyberbiosecurity vulnerabilities and establishing prevention best practices for emerging biotech hardware, software, data and bio-based systems. The Summit highlighted risks and explored mitigation strategies for a safer bioeconomy. Key takeaways include: (1) as genome databases proliferate globally, it becomes more likely that these databases will become targets for cyberbiosecurity attacks; (2) the biotech community should not view cybersecurity as an impediment to research, but rather as a national security and global health imperative for proactive investment and workforce training; (3) the bioeconomy depends on a vulnerable supply chain for software; and (4) mapping of a biological attack surface, inspired by traditional cybersecurity assessments, would facilitate identification of vulnerabilities of cyber-bio-physical systems and the development of protective measures for the bioeconomy. | ||
546 | |a EN | ||
690 | |a Artificial intelligence | ||
690 | |a bioeconomy | ||
690 | |a cyberbiosecurity | ||
690 | |a genomic sequencing | ||
690 | |a synthetic biology | ||
690 | |a Public aspects of medicine | ||
690 | |a RA1-1270 | ||
690 | |a Military Science | ||
690 | |a U | ||
655 | 7 | |a article |2 local | |
786 | 0 | |n Global Security: Health, Science and Policy, Vol 9, Iss 1 (2024) | |
787 | 0 | |n https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/23779497.2024.2401164 | |
787 | 0 | |n https://doaj.org/toc/2377-9497 | |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doaj.org/article/4db9eefd73f8423c99b1ce48e4cb6d04 |z Connect to this object online. |