Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Lisdexamfetamine Compared with D-Amphetamine in Healthy Subjects

Rationale: Lisdexamfetamine is a prodrug of D-amphetamine used for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Lisdexamfetamine is thought to have a prolonged pharmacokinetic profile compared with oral D-amphetamine, possibly associated with lower drug liking and a lower risk o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Patrick C. Dolder (Author), Petra Strajhar (Author), Patrick Vizeli (Author), Felix Hammann (Author), Alex Odermatt (Author), Matthias E. Liechti (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Frontiers Media S.A., 2017-09-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_4dd306e53adb4e1bb93f29b9d080a5ab
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Patrick C. Dolder  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Petra Strajhar  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Patrick Vizeli  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Felix Hammann  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Alex Odermatt  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Matthias E. Liechti  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Lisdexamfetamine Compared with D-Amphetamine in Healthy Subjects 
260 |b Frontiers Media S.A.,   |c 2017-09-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 1663-9812 
500 |a 10.3389/fphar.2017.00617 
520 |a Rationale: Lisdexamfetamine is a prodrug of D-amphetamine used for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Lisdexamfetamine is thought to have a prolonged pharmacokinetic profile compared with oral D-amphetamine, possibly associated with lower drug liking and a lower risk of oral misuse. However, differences in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of lisdexamfetamine and D-amphetamine have not been directly compared.Methods: Equimolar doses of D-amphetamine (40 mg) and lisdexamfetamine (100 mg), and placebo were administered in 24 healthy subjects in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study. Plasma concentrations of amphetamine, subjective effects, and vital signs were repeatedly assessed. The pharmacokinetic parameters were determined using compartmental modeling.Results: The increase in plasma concentrations of amphetamine had a 0.6 ± 0.6 h (mean ± SD) longer lag time and reached peak levels 1.1 ± 1.5 h later after lisdexamfetamine administration compared with D-amphetamine administration, but no differences in maximal concentrations or total exposure (AUC) were found between the two treatments. Consistent with the pharmacokinetics, the subjective and cardiovascular stimulant effects of lisdexamfetamine also occurred later compared with D-amphetamine. However, no differences in peak ratings of potentially abuse-related subjective drug effects (e.g., drug liking, drug high, stimulation, happy, well-being, and self-confidence) were observed after lisdexamfetamine administration compared with D-amphetamine administration. Lisdexamfetamine and D-amphetamine also produced similar peak increases in mean arterial blood pressure, heart rate, body temperature, pupil size, and adverse effects.Conclusion: The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of lisdexamfetamine are similar to D-amphetamine administered 1h later. Lisdexamfetamine is likely associated with a similar risk of oral abuse as D-amphetamine. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02668926). 
546 |a EN 
690 |a D-amphetamine 
690 |a lisdexamfetamine 
690 |a subjective effects 
690 |a autonomic effects 
690 |a healthy subjects 
690 |a Therapeutics. Pharmacology 
690 |a RM1-950 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Frontiers in Pharmacology, Vol 8 (2017) 
787 0 |n http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fphar.2017.00617/full 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1663-9812 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/4dd306e53adb4e1bb93f29b9d080a5ab  |z Connect to this object online.