Evaluation of physical-mechanical properties of self-adhesive versus conventional resin cements

Aim: The purpose of this study was to compare the microhardness, diametral tensile strength, compressive strength and the rheological properties of self-adhesive versus conventional resin cements. Methods: Specimens of a conventional (RelyX ARC) and 3 self-adhesive (RelyX U200, Maxcem Elite, Bifix S...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maria Helena Rossy Borges (Author), Carmen Gilda Tavares Dias (Author), Cristiane de Melo Alencar (Author), Cecy Martins Silva (Author), Renata Antunes Esteves (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Universidade Estadual de Campinas, 2020-09-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_4e2acbb058dc4e3ab0c13e3a60f2f072
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Maria Helena Rossy Borges  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Carmen Gilda Tavares Dias   |e author 
700 1 0 |a Cristiane de Melo Alencar  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Cecy Martins Silva  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Renata Antunes Esteves   |e author 
245 0 0 |a Evaluation of physical-mechanical properties of self-adhesive versus conventional resin cements 
260 |b Universidade Estadual de Campinas,   |c 2020-09-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.20396/bjos.v19i0.8658204 
500 |a 1677-3225 
520 |a Aim: The purpose of this study was to compare the microhardness, diametral tensile strength, compressive strength and the rheological properties of self-adhesive versus conventional resin cements. Methods: Specimens of a conventional (RelyX ARC) and 3 self-adhesive (RelyX U200, Maxcem Elite, Bifix SE) types of resin cements were prepared. The Knoop test was used to assess the microhardness, using a Microhardness Tester FM 700. For the diametral tensile strength test, a tensile strength was applied at a speed of 0.6 mm/minute. A universal testing machine was used for the analysis of compressive strength and a thermo-controlled oscillating rheometer was used for the Rheology test. One-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α=0.05) were used for data analysis. Results: According to microhardness analysis, all the cements were statistically similar (p>0.05), except for Maxcem that presented lower hardness compared with the other cements in relation to the top surface (p<0.05). In the diametral tensile strength test, Relyx U200 and RelyX ARC cements were statistically similar (p>0.05), presented higher value when compared to the Maxcem and Bifix cements (p<0.05). The compressive strength of RelyX ARC and Maxcem Elite cements was statistically higher than RelyX U200 and Bifix cements (p<0.05). Regarding the rheology test, Maxcem Elite and RelyX ARC cements showed a high modulus of elasticity. Conclusions: The self-adhesive cements presented poorer mechanical properties than conventional resin cement. Chemical structure and types of monomers employed interfere directly in the mechanical properties of resin cements. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Cementation 
690 |a Dental materials 
690 |a Flexural strength 
690 |a Longevity 
690 |a Resin cements 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences, Vol 19 (2020) 
787 0 |n https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8658204 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1677-3225 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/4e2acbb058dc4e3ab0c13e3a60f2f072  |z Connect to this object online.