Evaluation of physical-mechanical properties of self-adhesive versus conventional resin cements
Aim: The purpose of this study was to compare the microhardness, diametral tensile strength, compressive strength and the rheological properties of self-adhesive versus conventional resin cements. Methods: Specimens of a conventional (RelyX ARC) and 3 self-adhesive (RelyX U200, Maxcem Elite, Bifix S...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas,
2020-09-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000 am a22000003u 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | doaj_4e2acbb058dc4e3ab0c13e3a60f2f072 | ||
042 | |a dc | ||
100 | 1 | 0 | |a Maria Helena Rossy Borges |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Carmen Gilda Tavares Dias |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Cristiane de Melo Alencar |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Cecy Martins Silva |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Renata Antunes Esteves |e author |
245 | 0 | 0 | |a Evaluation of physical-mechanical properties of self-adhesive versus conventional resin cements |
260 | |b Universidade Estadual de Campinas, |c 2020-09-01T00:00:00Z. | ||
500 | |a 10.20396/bjos.v19i0.8658204 | ||
500 | |a 1677-3225 | ||
520 | |a Aim: The purpose of this study was to compare the microhardness, diametral tensile strength, compressive strength and the rheological properties of self-adhesive versus conventional resin cements. Methods: Specimens of a conventional (RelyX ARC) and 3 self-adhesive (RelyX U200, Maxcem Elite, Bifix SE) types of resin cements were prepared. The Knoop test was used to assess the microhardness, using a Microhardness Tester FM 700. For the diametral tensile strength test, a tensile strength was applied at a speed of 0.6 mm/minute. A universal testing machine was used for the analysis of compressive strength and a thermo-controlled oscillating rheometer was used for the Rheology test. One-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α=0.05) were used for data analysis. Results: According to microhardness analysis, all the cements were statistically similar (p>0.05), except for Maxcem that presented lower hardness compared with the other cements in relation to the top surface (p<0.05). In the diametral tensile strength test, Relyx U200 and RelyX ARC cements were statistically similar (p>0.05), presented higher value when compared to the Maxcem and Bifix cements (p<0.05). The compressive strength of RelyX ARC and Maxcem Elite cements was statistically higher than RelyX U200 and Bifix cements (p<0.05). Regarding the rheology test, Maxcem Elite and RelyX ARC cements showed a high modulus of elasticity. Conclusions: The self-adhesive cements presented poorer mechanical properties than conventional resin cement. Chemical structure and types of monomers employed interfere directly in the mechanical properties of resin cements. | ||
546 | |a EN | ||
690 | |a Cementation | ||
690 | |a Dental materials | ||
690 | |a Flexural strength | ||
690 | |a Longevity | ||
690 | |a Resin cements | ||
690 | |a Dentistry | ||
690 | |a RK1-715 | ||
655 | 7 | |a article |2 local | |
786 | 0 | |n Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences, Vol 19 (2020) | |
787 | 0 | |n https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8658204 | |
787 | 0 | |n https://doaj.org/toc/1677-3225 | |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doaj.org/article/4e2acbb058dc4e3ab0c13e3a60f2f072 |z Connect to this object online. |