Clinical comparison of guided tissue regeneration, with collagen membrane and bone graft, versus connective tissue graft in the treatment of gingival recessions
Background and Aim: Increasing patient demands for esthetic, put the root coverage procedures in particular attention. Periodontal regeneration with GTR based root coverage methods is the most common treatment used. The purpose of this study was to compare guided tissue regeneration (GTR) with colla...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Haghighati F (Author), Akbari S (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Tehran University of Medical Sciences,
2006-06-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Clinical Comparison of Subepithelial Connective Tissue Grafts and Coronally Advanced Flaps with Emdogain in the Treatment of Gingival Recessions
by: F. Haghighati, et al.
Published: (2007) -
Evaluation and comparison of hydroxyapatite crystals with collagen fibrils bone graft alone and in combination with guided tissue regeneration membrane
by: Shalabh Mehrotra, et al.
Published: (2019) -
Comparative evaluation of a bioabsorbable collagen membrane and connective tissue graft in the treatment of localized gingival recession: A clinical study
by: Harsha Mysore Babu, et al.
Published: (2011) -
Comparative Clinical Evaluation of Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft and Acellular Dermal Matrix Allograft for the Treatment of Gingival Recession
by: F. Haghighati, et al.
Published: (2006) -
Xenogeneic collagen matrix versus connective tissue graft for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
by: Mohammed A. AlSarhan, et al.
Published: (2019)