HTA - Algorithm or Process?; Comment on "Expanded HTA: Enhancing Fairness and Legitimacy"
Daniels, Porteny and Urrutia et al make a good case for the idea that that public decisions ought to be made not only "in the light of " evidence but also "on the basis of " budget impact, financial protection and equity. Health technology assessment (HTA) should, they say, be ac...
Saved in:
Main Author: | Anthony J. Culyer (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Kerman University of Medical Sciences,
2016-08-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Expanded HTA, Legitimacy and Independence; Comment on "Expanded HTA: Enhancing Fairness and Legitimacy"
by: Keith Syrett
Published: (2016) -
Expanded HTA: Enhancing Fairness and Legitimacy
by: Norman Daniels, et al.
Published: (2016) -
Correction: Expanded HTA: Enhancing Fairness and Legitimacy
by: Norman Daniels, et al.
Published: (2016) -
Fair Processes for Priority Setting: Putting Theory into Practice; Comment on "Expanded HTA: Enhancing Fairness and Legitimacy"
by: Maarten P. Jansen, et al.
Published: (2017) -
Beyond the Black Box Approach to Ethics! Comment on "Expanded HTA: Enhancing Fairness and Legitimacy"
by: Lars Sandman, et al.
Published: (2016)