The twenty factors that made teledermatology consultation a matured application: A systematic review

Background: Systematic reviews on various factors that favor teledermatology consultation (TC) are reported. Meta-analysis is available. TC gained momentum during the COVID-19 pandemic. Understanding the factors may help in planning and implementation of TC. Objective: To identify, classify, and ana...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Garehatty Rudrappa Kanthraj (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2023-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_4fe72855c2974b57a23976631e8fb03c
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Garehatty Rudrappa Kanthraj  |e author 
245 0 0 |a The twenty factors that made teledermatology consultation a matured application: A systematic review 
260 |b Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications,   |c 2023-01-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2542-551X 
500 |a 2542-5528 
500 |a 10.4103/cdr.cdr_19_22 
520 |a Background: Systematic reviews on various factors that favor teledermatology consultation (TC) are reported. Meta-analysis is available. TC gained momentum during the COVID-19 pandemic. Understanding the factors may help in planning and implementation of TC. Objective: To identify, classify, and analyze the various factors contributed to the growth of TC. Materials and Methods: The factors that have a positive influence on TC were noted. Seven academic databases (Cochrane, Pub Med, Medline, Science Direct, EMBASE, Google Scholar, and Web of Science) were searched with the keyword "TELEDERMATOLOGY." Systematic review and meta-analysis (1998-2021) investigating on various factors were chosen. However, only feasibility studies were examined and analyzed for those factors (sub-specialty TC application) where nonavailability of systematic review or meta-analysis. They were categorized with respect to factors related to (a) Technology platform, (b) Patient and (c) Physician interaction. They included the diagnostic accuracy and concordance, management accuracy and concordance, measures of time (waiting times, delay to diagnosis, and barriers to implementation, technology tools, patient-physician willingness, and satisfaction). Results: Total 1053 articles were screened. A total of 36 systematic reviews, 3 meta-analyses, and 13 feasibility studies identified twenty factors responsible for the growth and development of TC. There were 17 factors confirmed by systematic review and meta-analysis and 3 factors identified by 13 feasibility studies. Information technology-5 factors, role of dermatologist and patient 11 and 2 factors respectively were identified. COVID-19 pandemic and framing TC guidelines emerged as 2 independent factors. Conclusion: The constellation of twenty factors identified, classified and analyzed, confirms TC is a matured application to deliver dermatology care. Recommendation: Health-care providers and policymakers can consider these factors in planning and implementation. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a consultation 
690 |a implemrntaion 
690 |a planning 
690 |a teledermatology 
690 |a Dermatology 
690 |a RL1-803 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Clinical Dermatology Review, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 10-15 (2023) 
787 0 |n http://www.cdriadvlkn.org/article.asp?issn=2542-551X;year=2023;volume=7;issue=1;spage=10;epage=15;aulast=Kanthraj 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2542-551X 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2542-5528 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/4fe72855c2974b57a23976631e8fb03c  |z Connect to this object online.