Strategies for financing social health insurance schemes for providing universal health care: a comparative analysis of five countries

Background: Universal Health Coverage has become a political priority for many African countries yet there are clear challenges in achieving this goal. Though social health insurance is considered a mechanism for providing financial protection, less well documented in the literature is evidence from...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ama P. Fenny (Author), Robert Yates (Author), Rachel Thompson (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Taylor & Francis Group, 2021-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_4ff23dfa8c494df886f6fec87f5fe88f
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Ama P. Fenny  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Robert Yates  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Rachel Thompson  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Strategies for financing social health insurance schemes for providing universal health care: a comparative analysis of five countries 
260 |b Taylor & Francis Group,   |c 2021-01-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 1654-9880 
500 |a 10.1080/16549716.2020.1868054 
520 |a Background: Universal Health Coverage has become a political priority for many African countries yet there are clear challenges in achieving this goal. Though social health insurance is considered a mechanism for providing financial protection, less well documented in the literature is evidence from countries in Africa who are at various stages of adopting this financing strategy as a way to improve health insurance coverage for their populations. Objectives: The study investigates whether social health insurance schemes are effectively and efficiently covering all groups. The objective is to provide evidence of how these schemes have been implemented and whether the fundamental goals are met. The selected countries are Ghana, Rwanda, Tanzania, Kenya and Ethiopia. The study draws lessons from the literature about how policy tools can be used to reduce financial barriers whilst ensuring a broad geographic coverage in Africa. Methods: The study relies primarily on a review of literature, both documented and grey matter, which include key documents such as government health policy documents, strategic plans, health financing policy documents, Universal Health Coverage policy documents, published literature, unpublished documents, media reports and National Health Accounts reports. Results: The results show that each of the selected countries relies on a plurality of health insurance schemes with each targeting different groups. Additionally, many of the Social Health Insurance programs start by covering the formal sector first, with the hope of covering other groups in the informal sector at a later stage. Health insurance coverage for poor groups is very low, with targeting mechanisms to cover the poor in the form of exemptions and waivers achieving no desirable results. Conclusions: The ability for Social Health Insurance programs to cover all groups has been limited in the selected countries. Hence, relying solely on social health insurance schemes to achieve Universal Health Coverage may not be plausible in Africa. Also, highly fragmented risk pools impede efforts to widen the insurance pools and promote cross-subsidies. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a health financing 
690 |a kenya 
690 |a ghana 
690 |a ethiopia 
690 |a rwanda 
690 |a tanzania 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Global Health Action, Vol 14, Iss 1 (2021) 
787 0 |n http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2020.1868054 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1654-9880 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/4ff23dfa8c494df886f6fec87f5fe88f  |z Connect to this object online.