Development and validation of the activities and participation children and adolescents -neck (APCAN) measure

Abstract Background Neck pain is the fourth leading cause of years lost to disability in children warranting a comprehensive assessment of neck pain and its impact on activities and participation. Hence, the purpose of this study was to develop a new measure (i.e., Activities and Participation Child...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Devashish Tiwari (Author), Keshrie Naidoo (Author), Emily Z. Eddy (Author), Naseem Chatiwala (Author), Maninderjit Kaur (Author)
Format: Book
Published: SpringerOpen, 2023-10-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_510f40ba48a3447c9d2a2d6b9c48fef5
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Devashish Tiwari  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Keshrie Naidoo  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Emily Z. Eddy  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Naseem Chatiwala  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Maninderjit Kaur  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Development and validation of the activities and participation children and adolescents -neck (APCAN) measure 
260 |b SpringerOpen,   |c 2023-10-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1186/s41687-023-00648-x 
500 |a 2509-8020 
520 |a Abstract Background Neck pain is the fourth leading cause of years lost to disability in children warranting a comprehensive assessment of neck pain and its impact on activities and participation. Hence, the purpose of this study was to develop a new measure (i.e., Activities and Participation Children and Adolescents -neck [APCAN]) specific to evaluating activity limitation and participation restrictions in children and adolescents and to establish its content validity. Methods Development and content validation of the APCAN was completed in four steps: (1) item development, (2) item evaluation by content experts, (3) content validity calculation, and (4) cognitive testing via interviews to ensure readability and comprehension of the items on the APCAN. Results An initial pool of 52 items was created that was revised to 20 items after modified Delphi process and cognitive interviews. Each item was rated on a 0-10 numeric rating scale (0 = not difficult at all, 10 = extremely difficult) with higher scores indicating higher perceived disability secondary to neck pain. All 20 items retained the content validity ratio critical value and the overall content validity index was 0.88 indicating excellent content validity. Conclusion The APCAN provides an easy to use, comprehensive assessment of functional limitations associated with neck pain in children. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2023) 
787 0 |n https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-023-00648-x 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2509-8020 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/510f40ba48a3447c9d2a2d6b9c48fef5  |z Connect to this object online.