An ecocritical perspective on friluftsliv students' relationships with nature

Friluftsliv ("free-air life") and outdoor education programmes should educate for sustainable development in response to the crisis facing the natural world. By aiming for education for sustain-able development, friluftsliv education programmes could facilitate an ecocentric shift in the h...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tom Lund (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Cappelen Damm Akademisk NOASP, 2022-07-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_530dcac61301492aaab64140cc90a8af
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Tom Lund  |e author 
245 0 0 |a An ecocritical perspective on friluftsliv students' relationships with nature 
260 |b Cappelen Damm Akademisk NOASP,   |c 2022-07-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2535-2857 
500 |a 10.23865/jased.v6.3033 
520 |a Friluftsliv ("free-air life") and outdoor education programmes should educate for sustainable development in response to the crisis facing the natural world. By aiming for education for sustain-able development, friluftsliv education programmes could facilitate an ecocentric shift in the human-nature relationship that is arguably an underlying cause of the crisis. This article seeks new insight into friluftsliv students' relationship with nature through their reports on their own friluftsliv. The article aims to provide critical insight into how friluftsliv and outdoor education may lead to more sustainable relationships with nature. The empirical work consists of eight interviews analysed within a framework of posthuman and ecocritical theory. The findings indicate that the friluftsliv students in this study have formed an anthropocentric relationship with nature within a nature-culture dichotomy in their own friluftsliv. Although the students in this study are environmentally conscious, as they are building their relationship with nature within a nature-culture dichotomy, they do not hold themselves accountable beyond their own private relationship with nature. Consequently, these students experience tension within this nature-culture dichotomy between their ecologically aware relationship with nature and their anthropocentric view of nature. Friluftsliv and outdoor educational programmes should make their relationships with nature explicit and should critically examine how they represent nature through educational practice. 
546 |a DA 
546 |a EN 
546 |a NO 
690 |a outdoor education 
690 |a human-nature relationship 
690 |a education for sustainable development 
690 |a posthumanism 
690 |a Arts in general 
690 |a NX1-820 
690 |a Sports 
690 |a GV557-1198.995 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Journal for Research in Arts and Sports Education, Vol 6, Iss 2, Pp 21-36 (2022) 
787 0 |n https://jased.net/index.php/jased/article/view/3033/6596 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2535-2857 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/530dcac61301492aaab64140cc90a8af  |z Connect to this object online.