Exploring facilitation in virtual simulation in nursing education: A scoping review

Objective: To systematically map existing research regarding the reflective feedback in virtual simulation in undergraduate nursing education. Methods: A scoping review was conducted based on the Arksey and O'Malley framework and the PRISMA-ScR. Results: We included 41 studies from 15 different...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lena Günterberg Heyn (Author), Espen Andreas Brembo (Author), Kirsten Røland Byermoen (Author), Caroline Cruaud (Author), Hilde Eide (Author), Jill Flo (Author), Anita Nordsteien (Author), Grith Overgaard (Author), Hugrun Ösp Egilsdottir (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Elsevier, 2023-12-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_541b4c1b290b45ceb843e32cd3d64d95
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Lena Günterberg Heyn  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Espen Andreas Brembo  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Kirsten Røland Byermoen  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Caroline Cruaud  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Hilde Eide  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Jill Flo  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Anita Nordsteien  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Grith Overgaard  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Hugrun Ösp Egilsdottir  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Exploring facilitation in virtual simulation in nursing education: A scoping review 
260 |b Elsevier,   |c 2023-12-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2772-6282 
500 |a 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100233 
520 |a Objective: To systematically map existing research regarding the reflective feedback in virtual simulation in undergraduate nursing education. Methods: A scoping review was conducted based on the Arksey and O'Malley framework and the PRISMA-ScR. Results: We included 41 studies from 15 different countries. The simulation interventions allowed for interaction between the student and the virtual patient, the software, faculty, peers, or a combination of two or more of these. Students valued reflective feedback during and after the simulation. Conclusions: Our review emphasizes the importance of a human in the loop. Feedback before, during, and after the simulation is possible in virtual simulation where the facilitator can pause the virtual scenario and stimulate reflections during the simulation to obtain deep learning. Virtual simulation provides opportunities to give feedback from the software, such as cues or direct feedback. Innovation: There is a lack of focus on the feedback process and there is a need to revitalize the role of facilitators in a virtual simulation to determine their relative contribution in this process. Several studies reported the usefulness or the effect of virtual simulation on learning processes, but most lacked emphasis on investigating the significance of including a human in the loop. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Reflective feedback 
690 |a Virtual simulation 
690 |a Nursing education 
690 |a Scoping review 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n PEC Innovation, Vol 3, Iss , Pp 100233- (2023) 
787 0 |n http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772628223001139 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2772-6282 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/541b4c1b290b45ceb843e32cd3d64d95  |z Connect to this object online.