In Defense of Regulated Fee-for-Service Payment: A Response to Recent Commentaries

• Main Author: Naoki Ikegami (Author)
• Format: Book
• Published: Kerman University of Medical Sciences, 2015-09-01T00:00:00Z.
• Subjects: article
• Online Access: Connect to this object online.
• Notes: 10.15171/ijhpm.2015.131; 2322-5939; 2322-5939
• Keywords: Fee-for-Service (FFS); Electronic Medical Records (EMR); Japan; Public aspects of medicine; RA1-1270
• Source: International Journal of Health Policy and Management, Vol 4, Iss 9, Pp 635-636 (2015)

In health policy, magic bullet answers tend to have more appeal than incremental adjustments. Politicians faced with the daunting issues in healthcare are eager to embrace new ideas promoted by academics and think tanks. However, in implementation, intrinsic flaws in design, such as the difficulty of finding physicians willing to be at risk for the costs of care, tend to be ignored. Once launched, inconvenient data about cost savings and quality tend to be downplayed or ignored until intrinsic flaws become manifest,1 which would be the signal to embrace a new idea. Such is likely to be the fate of the latest fix-all from the United States: the Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs).