Push - out bond strength of intra - orifice barrier materials: Bulk - fill composite versus calcium silicate cement

Background. The aim of this study was to compare the push - out bond strengths of calcium silicate - based ProRoot MTA and Biodentine cements and SureFil SDR and EverX Posterior bulk - fill composite resins. Methods. Twenty - four single - rooted maxillary central incisors were sectioned below the c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Taha Özyürek (Author), Gülşah Uslu (Author), Koray Yılmaz (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, 2018-03-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background. The aim of this study was to compare the push - out bond strengths of calcium silicate - based ProRoot MTA and Biodentine cements and SureFil SDR and EverX Posterior bulk - fill composite resins. Methods. Twenty - four single - rooted maxillary central incisors were sectioned below the cementoenamel junction, and the root canals were instrumented using rotary files. Thereafter, a parallel post drill was used to ob tain a standardized root canal dimension. The roots were randomly assigned to one of the following groups with respect to the intra - orifice barrier used: ProRoot MTA; Biodentine; SureFil SDR; EverX Posterior. Five 1 - mm - thick sections were obtained from the coronal aspect of each root. Push - out bond strength testing was performed and data were analyzed with Kruskal - Wallis and post hoc Dunn tests ( P <0.05). Results. SureFil SDR and EverX Posterior bulk - fill composite resins' bond strengths were significantly h igher than ProRoot MTA and Biodentine calcium silicate cements. However, no statistically significant differences were observed between bulk - fill composite resins values and calcium silicate cement values. Conclusion . Within the limitations of present stud y, calcium silicate - based ProRoot MTA cement's push - out bond strength was lower than those of Biodentine, SureFil SDR and EverX Posterior materials.
Item Description:10.15171/joddd.2018.002
2008-210X
2008-2118