Forehead or ear temperature measurement cannot replace rectal measurements, except for screening purposes
Abstract Background Measuring rectal temperature in children is the gold standard, but ear or forehead measures are less traumatic and faster. The quality of non-invasive devices has improved but concerns remain whether they are reliable enough to substitute rectal thermometers. The aim was to evalu...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Christian Backer Mogensen (Author), Lena Wittenhoff (Author), Gitte Fruerhøj (Author), Stephen Hansen (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
BMC,
2018-01-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Limitations of temporal (forehead) temperature readings as a screening method for covid-19
by: Luis Fernando Aragón-Vargas
Published: (2020) -
Clinical Accuracy of Non-Contact Forehead Infrared Thermometer Measurement in Children: An Observational Study
by: Yeon-Mi Kim, et al.
Published: (2022) -
Newborn Screening Saves Lives but Cannot Replace the Need for Clinical Vigilance
by: F. Neemuchwala, et al.
Published: (2018) -
"Cannot ventilate cannot Intubate" Newborns
by: Ayten Saracoglu
Published: (2014) -
Pagetoid dyskeratosis of the forehead
by: Pankaj Salphale, et al.
Published: (2014)