Doctors' opinions on clinical coordination between primary and secondary care in the Catalan healthcare system
Objective: To analyse doctors' opinions on clinical coordination between primary and secondary care in different healthcare networks and on the factors influencing it. Methods: A qualitative descriptive-interpretative study was conducted, based on semi-structured interviews. A two-stage theoret...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Elsevier,
2019-01-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000 am a22000003u 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | doaj_57f64b0db6f64d3b868fe1a41a13a9f2 | ||
042 | |a dc | ||
100 | 1 | 0 | |a Marta-Beatriz Aller |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Ingrid Vargas |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Jordi Coderch |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Sebastià Calero |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Francesc Cots |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Mercè Abizanda |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Lluís Colomés |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Joan Farré |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a María-Luisa V |e author |
245 | 0 | 0 | |a Doctors' opinions on clinical coordination between primary and secondary care in the Catalan healthcare system |
260 | |b Elsevier, |c 2019-01-01T00:00:00Z. | ||
500 | |a 0213-9111 | ||
500 | |a 10.1016/j.gaceta.2017.06.001 | ||
520 | |a Objective: To analyse doctors' opinions on clinical coordination between primary and secondary care in different healthcare networks and on the factors influencing it. Methods: A qualitative descriptive-interpretative study was conducted, based on semi-structured interviews. A two-stage theoretical sample was designed: 1) healthcare networks with different management models; 2) primary care and secondary care doctors in each network. Final sample size (n = 50) was reached by saturation. A thematic content analysis was conducted. Results: In all networks doctors perceived that primary and secondary care given to patients was coordinated in terms of information transfer, consistency and accessibility to SC following a referral. However, some problems emerged, related to difficulties in acceding non-urgent secondary care changes in prescriptions and the inadequacy of some referrals across care levels. Doctors identified the following factors: 1) organizational influencing factors: coordination is facilitated by mechanisms that facilitate information transfer, communication, rapid access and physical proximity that fosters positive attitudes towards collaboration; coordination is hindered by the insufficient time to use mechanisms, unshared incentives in prescription and, in two networks, the change in the organizational model; 2) professional factors: clinical skills and attitudes towards coordination. Conclusions: Although doctors perceive that primary and secondary care is coordinated, they also highlighted problems. Identified factors offer valuable insights on where to direct organizational efforts to improve coordination. Resumen: Objetivo: Analizar la opinión de los médicos sobre la coordinación entre la atención primaria (AP) y la atención especializada (AE) en diferentes redes de servicios de salud, e identificar los factores relacionados. Método: Estudio cualitativo descriptivo-interpretativo basado en entrevistas semiestructuradas. Se diseñó una muestra teórica en dos etapas: 1) redes de servicios de salud con diferentes modelos de gestión; 2) en cada red, médicos de AP y AE. El tamaño muestral se alcanzó por saturación (n = 50). Se realizó un análisis temático de contenido. Resultados: En las tres redes, los médicos expresaron que la atención está coordinada en términos de intercambio de información, consistencia y accesibilidad de AE tras derivación urgente. Sin embargo, emergieron problemas relacionados con el acceso no urgente y cambios en prescripciones, y en dos redes la inadecuación clínica de las derivaciones entre ambos niveles. Se identificaron los siguientes factores relacionados: 1) organizativos: facilitan la coordinación, la existencia de mecanismos de transferencia de información, de comunicación y de acceso rápido, y la proximidad física que promueve actitudes positivas a la colaboración; la obstaculizan el tiempo insuficiente para el uso de mecanismos, incentivos no compartidos en la prescripción y, en dos redes, un cambio del modelo organizativo; 2) relacionados con los profesionales: habilidades clínicas y actitudes frente a la coordinación. Conclusiones: Aunque los médicos perciben que la atención entre niveles está coordinada, también señalan problemas. Los factores identificados muestran hacia dónde dirigir los esfuerzos organizativos para su mejora. Keywords: Clinical coordination between care levels, Integrated health care, Interprofessional relations, Organizational models, Qualitative research, Palabras clave: Coordinación clínica entre niveles de atención, Prestación integrada de atención de salud, Relaciones interprofesionales, Modelos organizativos, Investigación cualitativa | ||
546 | |a EN | ||
546 | |a ES | ||
690 | |a Public aspects of medicine | ||
690 | |a RA1-1270 | ||
655 | 7 | |a article |2 local | |
786 | 0 | |n Gaceta Sanitaria, Vol 33, Iss 1, Pp 66-73 (2019) | |
787 | 0 | |n http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S021391111730167X | |
787 | 0 | |n https://doaj.org/toc/0213-9111 | |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doaj.org/article/57f64b0db6f64d3b868fe1a41a13a9f2 |z Connect to this object online. |