Foot tapping and unilateral vertical jump performance in athletes after knee surgery: an explorative cross-sectional study

• Main Authors: Eduard Kurz (Author), René Schwesig (Author), Stefan Pröger (Author), Karl-Stefan Delank (Author), Thomas Bartels (Author)
• Format: Book
• Published: BMC, 2022-03-01T00:00:00Z.
• Subjects: article
• Online Access: Connect to this object online.
• Notes: 10.1186/s13102-022-00422-4; 2052-1847
• Keywords: Knee joint; Anterior cruciate ligament; Rehabilitation; Return to sports; Sports medicine; RC1200-1245
• Source: BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol 14, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2022)

Abstract Background Guiding athletes through the rehabilitation process and judging the time at which return to sports can be enabled after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are still challenging processes. The purpose of this explorative cross-sectional study was to retrospectively compare unilateral vertical jump as well as vertical foot tapping outcomes in athletes returned to sports after ACL reconstruction (ACLR) with uninjured athletes. Methods Seven-teen ACLR athletes (male/female: 12/5) were examined 11 (6-23) months after their ACL injury and after return to sport clearance together with 67 uninjured athletes (male/female: 51/16). Seventeen age and stature matched controls were selected from the sample of uninjured athletes. Participants unilaterally performed acyclic (squat jump, SJ; drop jump, DJ) and cyclic (foot tapping, FT) tests. SJ peak power, DJ take-off efficiency (TOE) and FT coefficients (FTC) were compared between ACLR and matched as well as unmatched control groups. Limb symmetry index (LSI) as well as performance score were calculated. Results Analyses of the SJ peak power revealed moderate effects of group (right: P < 0.09, ηp 2 = 0.06; left: P < 0.05, ηp 2 = 0.08). The TOE was largely affected by group (right: P < 0.01, ηp 2 = 0.12; left: P < 0.01, ηp 2 = 0.13). No effect of group was found on the FTC (P > 0.8, ηp 2 < 0.01). The SJ peak power LSI (r = 0.46, P < 0.07) and TOE LSI (r = 0.38, P = 0.13) were positively associated with the performance score of the ACLR group. Conclusion Although already returned to sports, the ACLR group underperformed the matched and unmatched control groups significantly. Unilaterally performed vertical jumps may provide additional information on athletes' rehabilitation progress and help to manage the rehabilitation process and decisions on potential readiness after ACLR. More attention should be paid to the direction of the LSI results.