Transitional care for patients with acute stroke-A priority‐setting project

Abstract Background The scope of this priority‐setting process is communication and collaboration in transitional care for patients with acute stroke. Actively involving persons with stroke and their family caregivers is important both in transitional care and when setting priorities for research. E...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Liss Marita Solbakken (Author), Birgitta Langhammer (Author), Antje Sundseth (Author), Therese Brovold (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Wiley, 2022-08-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_5a1d9bb268dc4db5a857de3661a6e67c
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Liss Marita Solbakken  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Birgitta Langhammer  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Antje Sundseth  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Therese Brovold  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Transitional care for patients with acute stroke-A priority‐setting project 
260 |b Wiley,   |c 2022-08-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 1369-7625 
500 |a 1369-6513 
500 |a 10.1111/hex.13517 
520 |a Abstract Background The scope of this priority‐setting process is communication and collaboration in transitional care for patients with acute stroke. Actively involving persons with stroke and their family caregivers is important both in transitional care and when setting priorities for research. Established priority‐setting methods are time‐consuming and require extensive resources. They are therefore not feasible in small‐scale research. This article describes a pragmatic priority‐setting process to identify a prioritized top 10 list of research needs regarding transitional care for patients with acute stroke. Methods A pragmatic priority‐setting approach inspired by the James Lind Alliance was developed. It involves establishing a user group, identifying the research needs through an online survey, analysing and checking the research needs against systematic reviews, culminating in an online prioritization of the top 10 list. Results The process was completed in 7 months. A total of 122 patients, family caregivers, health personnel and caseworkers submitted 484 research needs, and 19 users prioritized the top 10 list. The list includes the categories 'patients and caregivers' needs and health literacy', 'health personnel's common understanding', 'information flow between health personnel and patients and caregivers', 'available interventions and follow‐up of patients and caregivers', 'interaction and collaboration between health personnel and caseworkers across hospital and primary healthcare' and 'disabilities after stroke'. Conclusion This paper outlines a pragmatic approach to identifying and prioritizing users' research needs that was completed in 7 months. The top 10 list resulting from this priority setting process can guide future research relating to communication and collaboration during the transition from hospital to the community for patients with stroke. Patient and Public Contribution Members of three stroke organizations participated in the advisory group. They gave feedback on the scope and the process, distributed the surveys and prioritized the top 10 list. Persons with stroke and their caregivers submitted research needs in the survey. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a collaboration 
690 |a communication 
690 |a priority setting 
690 |a research needs 
690 |a stroke 
690 |a transitional care 
690 |a Medicine (General) 
690 |a R5-920 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Health Expectations, Vol 25, Iss 4, Pp 1741-1752 (2022) 
787 0 |n https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13517 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1369-6513 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1369-7625 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/5a1d9bb268dc4db5a857de3661a6e67c  |z Connect to this object online.