The Problem of Confounding in Studies of the Effect of Maternal Drug Use on Pregnancy Outcome

In most epidemilogical studies, the problem of confounding adds to the uncertainty in conclusions drawn. This is also true for studies on the effect of maternal drug use on birth defect risks. This paper describes various types of such confounders and discusses methods to identify and adjust for the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bengt Källén (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Hindawi Limited, 2012-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_5a6ecbcb56024f9d80e1c91db2c76cac
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Bengt Källén  |e author 
245 0 0 |a The Problem of Confounding in Studies of the Effect of Maternal Drug Use on Pregnancy Outcome 
260 |b Hindawi Limited,   |c 2012-01-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 1687-9589 
500 |a 1687-9597 
500 |a 10.1155/2012/148616 
520 |a In most epidemilogical studies, the problem of confounding adds to the uncertainty in conclusions drawn. This is also true for studies on the effect of maternal drug use on birth defect risks. This paper describes various types of such confounders and discusses methods to identify and adjust for them. Such confounders can be found in maternal characteristics like age, parity, smoking, use of alcohol, and body mass index, subfertility, and previous pregnancies including previous birth of a malformed child, socioeconomy, race/ethnicity, or country of birth. Confounding by concomitant maternal drug use may occur. A geographical or seasonal confounding can exist. In rare instances, infant sex and multiple birth can appear as confounders. The most difficult problem to solve is often confounding by indication. The problem of confounding is less important for congenital malformations than for many other pregnancy outcomes. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Gynecology and obstetrics 
690 |a RG1-991 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Obstetrics and Gynecology International, Vol 2012 (2012) 
787 0 |n http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/148616 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1687-9589 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1687-9597 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/5a6ecbcb56024f9d80e1c91db2c76cac  |z Connect to this object online.