Examining the militarised hierarchy of Sierra Leone's Ebola response and implications for decision making during public health emergencies

Abstract Background In September, 2014, Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) called for militarised assistance in response to the rapidly escalating West Africa Ebola Epidemic. Soon after, the United Kingdom deployed its military to Sierra Leone, which (among other contributions) helped to support the e...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Samuel T. Boland (Author), Dina Balabanova (Author), Susannah Mayhew (Author)
Format: Book
Published: BMC, 2023-11-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_5b1569f4cded4282ab29da564a474011
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Samuel T. Boland  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Dina Balabanova  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Susannah Mayhew  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Examining the militarised hierarchy of Sierra Leone's Ebola response and implications for decision making during public health emergencies 
260 |b BMC,   |c 2023-11-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1186/s12992-023-00995-w 
500 |a 1744-8603 
520 |a Abstract Background In September, 2014, Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) called for militarised assistance in response to the rapidly escalating West Africa Ebola Epidemic. Soon after, the United Kingdom deployed its military to Sierra Leone, which (among other contributions) helped to support the establishment of novel and military-led Ebola Virus Disease (Ebola) response centres throughout the country. To examine these civil-military structures and their effects, 110 semi-structured interviews with civilian and military Ebola Response Workers (ERWs) were conducted and analysed using neo-Durkheimian theory. Results The hierarchical Ebola response centres were found to be spaces of 'conflict attenuation' for their use of 'rule-bound niches', 'neutral zones', 'co-dependence', and 'hybridity', thereby not only easing civil-military relationships (CMRel), but also increasing the efficiency of their application to Ebola response interventions. Furthermore, the hierarchical response centres were also found to be inclusive spaces that further increased efficiency through the decentralisation and localisation of these interventions and daily decision making, albeit for mostly privileged groups and in limited ways. Conclusions This demonstrates how hierarchy and localisation can (and perhaps should) go hand-in-hand during future public health emergency responses as a strategy for more robustly including typically marginalised local actors, while also improving necessary efficiency-in other words, an 'inclusive hierarchical coordination' that is both operationally viable and an ethical imperative. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Sierra Leone 
690 |a Ebola 
690 |a Securitisation 
690 |a Militarisation 
690 |a Humanitarian intervention 
690 |a Public health emergencies 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Globalization and Health, Vol 19, Iss 1, Pp 1-23 (2023) 
787 0 |n https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-023-00995-w 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1744-8603 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/5b1569f4cded4282ab29da564a474011  |z Connect to this object online.