The Effects of Modeling, Prompting, and Reinforcement in Deictic Gesture Instruction of a Student with Autism

The purpose of this study was to explore the effects of gesture instruction on the communication abilities of a student with autism. The multiple probe across settings of the single-case approach was conducted. The independent variable was gesture instruction, and the dependent variable was communic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jung Chang Tang (Author), Wan Ju Shih (Author)
Format: Book
Published: UUM Press, 2006-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_5b80e641dc5b49b09c8cad1df5afdb16
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Jung Chang Tang  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Wan Ju Shih  |e author 
245 0 0 |a The Effects of Modeling, Prompting, and Reinforcement in Deictic Gesture Instruction of a Student with Autism 
260 |b UUM Press,   |c 2006-01-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 1675-8110 
500 |a 2180-2483 
520 |a The purpose of this study was to explore the effects of gesture instruction on the communication abilities of a student with autism. The multiple probe across settings of the single-case approach was conducted. The independent variable was gesture instruction, and the dependent variable was communication behaviour including the frequency of motoric gesture communication and deictic gesture communication. The participant accepted the experimental treatment of baseline, processing and maintenance phase one by one. Visual inspection was employed to assess the treatment effects of gesture instruction on this student. Results of this study showed that gesture instruction enhanced the frequency of the student’s deictic gesture communication behaviour. The treatment effects could be maintained for two weeks and be generalized to another situation. Additionally, gesture instruction decreased the frequency of the student’s motoric gesture communication behaviour and the treatment effects could be maintained for two weeks. After intervention, both teachers and parents interviewed indicated positive attitudes toward the gesture instruction, and confirmed the improvement on communication performance of this student.   
546 |a EN 
546 |a MS 
690 |a Education 
690 |a L 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, Vol 3 (2006) 
787 0 |n https://www.e-journal.uum.edu.my/index.php/mjli/article/view/7583 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1675-8110 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2180-2483 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/5b80e641dc5b49b09c8cad1df5afdb16  |z Connect to this object online.