Comparative cost analysis of cervical cancer screening programme based on molecular detection of HPV in Spain

Abstract Background HPV cervical cancer screening (CCS) must use validated HPV tests based on the molecular detection of either viral mRNA (Aptima HPV Assay-AHPV) or DNA. AHPV has demonstrated the same cross-sectional and longitudinal sensitivity for the detection of HSIL/CIN2+ lesions but with grea...

詳細記述

保存先:
書誌詳細
主要な著者: R. Ibáñez (著者), M. Mareque (著者), R. Granados (著者), D. Andía (著者), M. García-Rojo (著者), J. C. Quílez (著者), I. Oyagüez (著者)
フォーマット: 図書
出版事項: BMC, 2021-04-01T00:00:00Z.
主題:
オンライン・アクセス:Connect to this object online.
タグ: タグ追加
タグなし, このレコードへの初めてのタグを付けませんか!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_5bae43f83c6443c1a7b187748ab86582
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a R. Ibáñez  |e author 
700 1 0 |a M. Mareque  |e author 
700 1 0 |a R. Granados  |e author 
700 1 0 |a D. Andía  |e author 
700 1 0 |a M. García-Rojo  |e author 
700 1 0 |a J. C. Quílez  |e author 
700 1 0 |a I. Oyagüez  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Comparative cost analysis of cervical cancer screening programme based on molecular detection of HPV in Spain 
260 |b BMC,   |c 2021-04-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1186/s12905-021-01310-8 
500 |a 1472-6874 
520 |a Abstract Background HPV cervical cancer screening (CCS) must use validated HPV tests based on the molecular detection of either viral mRNA (Aptima HPV Assay-AHPV) or DNA. AHPV has demonstrated the same cross-sectional and longitudinal sensitivity for the detection of HSIL/CIN2+ lesions but with greater specificity than HPV-DNA tests. The study aimed to estimate the total costs of a CCS with a primary HPV test based on the detection of mRNA compared to DNA in women aged 35-65 years for the National Health System. Methods A decision-tree-based model to estimate the cost of the CCS until the first colposcopy was designed based on Spanish CCS guidelines. The total cost (€, 2019) for CCS with AHPV or DNA tests (HC2 and Cobas) was calculated, including HPV test, liquid-based cytology (LBC) and colposcopy, for a population of 7,263,529 women aged 35-65 years (assuming 70% coverage). Clinical inputs derived from a literature review were validated by a multidisciplinary expert panel. Data from head-to-head studies between different HPV tests were selected. Results The use of AHPV showed reduction of 290,541 (− 35%) and 355,913 (− 40%) LBC compared to HC2 or Cobas, respectively. Furthermore, AHPV avoided 151,699 (− 47%) colposcopies versus HC2 and 151,165 (− 47%) versus Cobas. The total cost of CCS was € 282,747,877 with AHPV, € 322,587,588 with HC2 and € 324,614,490 with Cobas. Therefore, AHPV savings € − 39,839,711 versus HC2 and € − 41,866,613 versus Cobas. Conclusions Assuming that 70% of women from 35 to 65 years attend the CCS programme, the cost of screening up to the first colposcopy using AHPV would provide cost savings of up to € 41.9 million versus DNA tests in Spain. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Cervical cancer screening 
690 |a Human papilloma virus 
690 |a Aptima HPV assay 
690 |a Cost analysis 
690 |a Gynecology and obstetrics 
690 |a RG1-991 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n BMC Women's Health, Vol 21, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2021) 
787 0 |n https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-021-01310-8 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1472-6874 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/5bae43f83c6443c1a7b187748ab86582  |z Connect to this object online.