Priority Setting for Universal Health Coverage: We Need Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes, Not Just More Evidence on Cost-Effectiveness
Priority setting of health interventions is generally considered as a valuable approach to support low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) in their strive for universal health coverage (UHC). However, present initiatives on priority setting are mainly geared towards the development of more cost-eff...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Rob Baltussen (Author), Maarten P. Jansen (Author), Evelinn Mikkelsen (Author), Noor Tromp (Author), Jan Hontelez (Author), Leon Bijlmakers (Author), Gert Jan Van der Wilt (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Kerman University of Medical Sciences,
2016-11-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes - Early Dialogue, Broad Focus and Relevance: A Response to Recent Commentaries
by: Maarten P. Jansen, et al.
Published: (2018) -
Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes for Universal Health Coverage: Broadening the Scope; Comment on "Priority Setting for Universal Health Coverage: We Need Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes, Not Just More Evidence on Cost-Effectiveness"
by: Unni Gopinathan, et al.
Published: (2017) -
Use of Evidence-informed Deliberative Processes by Health Technology Assessment Agencies Around The Globe
by: Wija Oortwijn, et al.
Published: (2020) -
Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes for Health Benefit Package Design - Part II: A Practical Guide
by: Wija Oortwijn, et al.
Published: (2022) -
Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes for Legitimate Health Benefit Package Design − Part I: Conceptual Framework
by: Rob Baltussen, et al.
Published: (2022)